Browse Source

drm/nv20: Don't use pushbuf calls on the original nv20.

The "return" command is buggy on the original nv20, it jumps back to
the caller address as expected, but it doesn't clear the subroutine
active bit making the subsequent pushbuf calls fail with a "stack"
overflow.

Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Francisco Jerez 15 năm trước cách đây
mục cha
commit
ee508b821c
1 tập tin đã thay đổi với 2 bổ sung2 xóa
  1. 2 2
      drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c

@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 				      push[i].length);
 		}
 	} else
-	if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+	if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
 		ret = RING_SPACE(chan, req->nr_push * 2);
 		if (ret) {
 			NV_ERROR(dev, "cal_space: %d\n", ret);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ out_next:
 		req->suffix0 = 0x00000000;
 		req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
 	} else
-	if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+	if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
 		req->suffix0 = 0x00020000;
 		req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
 	} else {