소스 검색

drm/nv20: Don't use pushbuf calls on the original nv20.

The "return" command is buggy on the original nv20, it jumps back to
the caller address as expected, but it doesn't clear the subroutine
active bit making the subsequent pushbuf calls fail with a "stack"
overflow.

Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Francisco Jerez 15 년 전
부모
커밋
ee508b821c
1개의 변경된 파일2개의 추가작업 그리고 2개의 파일을 삭제
  1. 2 2
      drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c

@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 				      push[i].length);
 		}
 	} else
-	if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+	if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
 		ret = RING_SPACE(chan, req->nr_push * 2);
 		if (ret) {
 			NV_ERROR(dev, "cal_space: %d\n", ret);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ out_next:
 		req->suffix0 = 0x00000000;
 		req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
 	} else
-	if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+	if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
 		req->suffix0 = 0x00020000;
 		req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
 	} else {