|
@@ -97,19 +97,19 @@
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* The documentation is an adventure: it's close but not fully accurate. I
|
|
|
* found out that after a reset some registers are *NOT* reset, though the
|
|
|
- * docs say the would be. Interresting ones are 0x7f, 0x7d and 0x7a. They are
|
|
|
- * related to the Audio 2 channel. I also was suprised about the consequenses
|
|
|
+ * docs say the would be. Interesting ones are 0x7f, 0x7d and 0x7a. They are
|
|
|
+ * related to the Audio 2 channel. I also was surprised about the consequences
|
|
|
* of writing 0x00 to 0x7f (which should be done by reset): The ES1887 moves
|
|
|
* into ES1888 mode. This means that it claims IRQ 11, which happens to be my
|
|
|
* ISDN adapter. Needless to say it no longer worked. I now understand why
|
|
|
* after rebooting 0x7f already was 0x05, the value of my choice: the BIOS
|
|
|
* did it.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * Oh, and this is another trap: in ES1887 docs mixer register 0x70 is decribed
|
|
|
- * as if it's exactly the same as register 0xa1. This is *NOT* true. The
|
|
|
- * description of 0x70 in ES1869 docs is accurate however.
|
|
|
+ * Oh, and this is another trap: in ES1887 docs mixer register 0x70 is
|
|
|
+ * described as if it's exactly the same as register 0xa1. This is *NOT* true.
|
|
|
+ * The description of 0x70 in ES1869 docs is accurate however.
|
|
|
* Well, the assumption about ES1869 was wrong: register 0x70 is very much
|
|
|
- * like register 0xa1, except that bit 7 is allways 1, whatever you want
|
|
|
+ * like register 0xa1, except that bit 7 is always 1, whatever you want
|
|
|
* it to be.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* When using audio 2 mixer register 0x72 seems te be meaningless. Only 0xa2
|
|
@@ -117,10 +117,10 @@
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Software reset not being able to reset all registers is great! Especially
|
|
|
* the fact that register 0x78 isn't reset is great when you wanna change back
|
|
|
- * to single dma operation (simplex): audio 2 is still operation, and uses the
|
|
|
- * same dma as audio 1: your ess changes into a funny echo machine.
|
|
|
+ * to single dma operation (simplex): audio 2 is still operational, and uses
|
|
|
+ * the same dma as audio 1: your ess changes into a funny echo machine.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * Received the new that ES1688 is detected as a ES1788. Did some thinking:
|
|
|
+ * Received the news that ES1688 is detected as a ES1788. Did some thinking:
|
|
|
* the ES1887 detection scheme suggests in step 2 to try if bit 3 of register
|
|
|
* 0x64 can be changed. This is inaccurate, first I inverted the * check: "If
|
|
|
* can be modified, it's a 1688", which lead to a correct detection
|
|
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
|
|
|
* About recognition of ESS chips
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* The distinction of ES688, ES1688, ES1788, ES1887 and ES1888 is described in
|
|
|
- * a (preliminary ??) datasheet on ES1887. It's aim is to identify ES1887, but
|
|
|
+ * a (preliminary ??) datasheet on ES1887. Its aim is to identify ES1887, but
|
|
|
* during detection the text claims that "this chip may be ..." when a step
|
|
|
* fails. This scheme is used to distinct between the above chips.
|
|
|
* It appears however that some PnP chips like ES1868 are recognized as ES1788
|
|
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* The existing ES1688 support didn't take care of the ES1688+ recording
|
|
|
* levels very well. Whenever a device was selected (recmask) for recording
|
|
|
- * it's recording level was loud, and it couldn't be changed. The fact that
|
|
|
+ * its recording level was loud, and it couldn't be changed. The fact that
|
|
|
* internal register 0xb4 could take care of RECLEV, didn't work meaning until
|
|
|
- * it's value was restored every time the chip was reset; this reset the
|
|
|
+ * its value was restored every time the chip was reset; this reset the
|
|
|
* value of 0xb4 too. I guess that's what 4front also had (have?) trouble with.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* About ES1887 support:
|
|
@@ -169,9 +169,9 @@
|
|
|
* the latter case the recording volumes are 0.
|
|
|
* Now recording levels of inputs can be controlled, by changing the playback
|
|
|
* levels. Futhermore several devices can be recorded together (which is not
|
|
|
- * possible with the ES1688.
|
|
|
+ * possible with the ES1688).
|
|
|
* Besides the separate recording level control for each input, the common
|
|
|
- * recordig level can also be controlled by RECLEV as described above.
|
|
|
+ * recording level can also be controlled by RECLEV as described above.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Not only ES1887 have this recording mixer. I know the following from the
|
|
|
* documentation:
|