|
@@ -590,14 +590,41 @@ abort:
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+static u32 md_csum_fold(u32 csum)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ csum = (csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16);
|
|
|
+ return (csum & 0xffff) + (csum >> 16);
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
static unsigned int calc_sb_csum(mdp_super_t * sb)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
+ u64 newcsum = 0;
|
|
|
+ u32 *sb32 = (u32*)sb;
|
|
|
+ int i;
|
|
|
unsigned int disk_csum, csum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
disk_csum = sb->sb_csum;
|
|
|
sb->sb_csum = 0;
|
|
|
- csum = csum_partial((void *)sb, MD_SB_BYTES, 0);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ for (i = 0; i < MD_SB_BYTES/4 ; i++)
|
|
|
+ newcsum += sb32[i];
|
|
|
+ csum = (newcsum & 0xffffffff) + (newcsum>>32);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_ALPHA
|
|
|
+ /* This used to use csum_partial, which was wrong for several
|
|
|
+ * reasons including that different results are returned on
|
|
|
+ * different architectures. It isn't critical that we get exactly
|
|
|
+ * the same return value as before (we always csum_fold before
|
|
|
+ * testing, and that removes any differences). However as we
|
|
|
+ * know that csum_partial always returned a 16bit value on
|
|
|
+ * alphas, do a fold to maximise conformity to previous behaviour.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ sb->sb_csum = md_csum_fold(disk_csum);
|
|
|
+#else
|
|
|
sb->sb_csum = disk_csum;
|
|
|
+#endif
|
|
|
return csum;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -685,7 +712,7 @@ static int super_90_load(mdk_rdev_t *rdev, mdk_rdev_t *refdev, int minor_version
|
|
|
if (sb->raid_disks <= 0)
|
|
|
goto abort;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if (csum_fold(calc_sb_csum(sb)) != csum_fold(sb->sb_csum)) {
|
|
|
+ if (md_csum_fold(calc_sb_csum(sb)) != md_csum_fold(sb->sb_csum)) {
|
|
|
printk(KERN_WARNING "md: invalid superblock checksum on %s\n",
|
|
|
b);
|
|
|
goto abort;
|