f2fs.txt 19 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423
  1. ================================================================================
  2. WHAT IS Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS)?
  3. ================================================================================
  4. NAND flash memory-based storage devices, such as SSD, eMMC, and SD cards, have
  5. been equipped on a variety systems ranging from mobile to server systems. Since
  6. they are known to have different characteristics from the conventional rotating
  7. disks, a file system, an upper layer to the storage device, should adapt to the
  8. changes from the sketch in the design level.
  9. F2FS is a file system exploiting NAND flash memory-based storage devices, which
  10. is based on Log-structured File System (LFS). The design has been focused on
  11. addressing the fundamental issues in LFS, which are snowball effect of wandering
  12. tree and high cleaning overhead.
  13. Since a NAND flash memory-based storage device shows different characteristic
  14. according to its internal geometry or flash memory management scheme, namely FTL,
  15. F2FS and its tools support various parameters not only for configuring on-disk
  16. layout, but also for selecting allocation and cleaning algorithms.
  17. The file system formatting tool, "mkfs.f2fs", is available from the following
  18. git tree:
  19. >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs-tools.git
  20. For reporting bugs and sending patches, please use the following mailing list:
  21. >> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  22. ================================================================================
  23. BACKGROUND AND DESIGN ISSUES
  24. ================================================================================
  25. Log-structured File System (LFS)
  26. --------------------------------
  27. "A log-structured file system writes all modifications to disk sequentially in
  28. a log-like structure, thereby speeding up both file writing and crash recovery.
  29. The log is the only structure on disk; it contains indexing information so that
  30. files can be read back from the log efficiently. In order to maintain large free
  31. areas on disk for fast writing, we divide the log into segments and use a
  32. segment cleaner to compress the live information from heavily fragmented
  33. segments." from Rosenblum, M. and Ousterhout, J. K., 1992, "The design and
  34. implementation of a log-structured file system", ACM Trans. Computer Systems
  35. 10, 1, 26–52.
  36. Wandering Tree Problem
  37. ----------------------
  38. In LFS, when a file data is updated and written to the end of log, its direct
  39. pointer block is updated due to the changed location. Then the indirect pointer
  40. block is also updated due to the direct pointer block update. In this manner,
  41. the upper index structures such as inode, inode map, and checkpoint block are
  42. also updated recursively. This problem is called as wandering tree problem [1],
  43. and in order to enhance the performance, it should eliminate or relax the update
  44. propagation as much as possible.
  45. [1] Bityutskiy, A. 2005. JFFS3 design issues. http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/
  46. Cleaning Overhead
  47. -----------------
  48. Since LFS is based on out-of-place writes, it produces so many obsolete blocks
  49. scattered across the whole storage. In order to serve new empty log space, it
  50. needs to reclaim these obsolete blocks seamlessly to users. This job is called
  51. as a cleaning process.
  52. The process consists of three operations as follows.
  53. 1. A victim segment is selected through referencing segment usage table.
  54. 2. It loads parent index structures of all the data in the victim identified by
  55. segment summary blocks.
  56. 3. It checks the cross-reference between the data and its parent index structure.
  57. 4. It moves valid data selectively.
  58. This cleaning job may cause unexpected long delays, so the most important goal
  59. is to hide the latencies to users. And also definitely, it should reduce the
  60. amount of valid data to be moved, and move them quickly as well.
  61. ================================================================================
  62. KEY FEATURES
  63. ================================================================================
  64. Flash Awareness
  65. ---------------
  66. - Enlarge the random write area for better performance, but provide the high
  67. spatial locality
  68. - Align FS data structures to the operational units in FTL as best efforts
  69. Wandering Tree Problem
  70. ----------------------
  71. - Use a term, “node”, that represents inodes as well as various pointer blocks
  72. - Introduce Node Address Table (NAT) containing the locations of all the “node”
  73. blocks; this will cut off the update propagation.
  74. Cleaning Overhead
  75. -----------------
  76. - Support a background cleaning process
  77. - Support greedy and cost-benefit algorithms for victim selection policies
  78. - Support multi-head logs for static/dynamic hot and cold data separation
  79. - Introduce adaptive logging for efficient block allocation
  80. ================================================================================
  81. MOUNT OPTIONS
  82. ================================================================================
  83. background_gc_off Turn off cleaning operations, namely garbage collection,
  84. triggered in background when I/O subsystem is idle.
  85. disable_roll_forward Disable the roll-forward recovery routine
  86. discard Issue discard/TRIM commands when a segment is cleaned.
  87. no_heap Disable heap-style segment allocation which finds free
  88. segments for data from the beginning of main area, while
  89. for node from the end of main area.
  90. nouser_xattr Disable Extended User Attributes. Note: xattr is enabled
  91. by default if CONFIG_F2FS_FS_XATTR is selected.
  92. noacl Disable POSIX Access Control List. Note: acl is enabled
  93. by default if CONFIG_F2FS_FS_POSIX_ACL is selected.
  94. active_logs=%u Support configuring the number of active logs. In the
  95. current design, f2fs supports only 2, 4, and 6 logs.
  96. Default number is 6.
  97. disable_ext_identify Disable the extension list configured by mkfs, so f2fs
  98. does not aware of cold files such as media files.
  99. ================================================================================
  100. DEBUGFS ENTRIES
  101. ================================================================================
  102. /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/ contains information about all the partitions mounted as
  103. f2fs. Each file shows the whole f2fs information.
  104. /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status includes:
  105. - major file system information managed by f2fs currently
  106. - average SIT information about whole segments
  107. - current memory footprint consumed by f2fs.
  108. ================================================================================
  109. USAGE
  110. ================================================================================
  111. 1. Download userland tools and compile them.
  112. 2. Skip, if f2fs was compiled statically inside kernel.
  113. Otherwise, insert the f2fs.ko module.
  114. # insmod f2fs.ko
  115. 3. Create a directory trying to mount
  116. # mkdir /mnt/f2fs
  117. 4. Format the block device, and then mount as f2fs
  118. # mkfs.f2fs -l label /dev/block_device
  119. # mount -t f2fs /dev/block_device /mnt/f2fs
  120. Format options
  121. --------------
  122. -l [label] : Give a volume label, up to 512 unicode name.
  123. -a [0 or 1] : Split start location of each area for heap-based allocation.
  124. 1 is set by default, which performs this.
  125. -o [int] : Set overprovision ratio in percent over volume size.
  126. 5 is set by default.
  127. -s [int] : Set the number of segments per section.
  128. 1 is set by default.
  129. -z [int] : Set the number of sections per zone.
  130. 1 is set by default.
  131. -e [str] : Set basic extension list. e.g. "mp3,gif,mov"
  132. -t [0 or 1] : Disable discard command or not.
  133. 1 is set by default, which conducts discard.
  134. ================================================================================
  135. DESIGN
  136. ================================================================================
  137. On-disk Layout
  138. --------------
  139. F2FS divides the whole volume into a number of segments, each of which is fixed
  140. to 2MB in size. A section is composed of consecutive segments, and a zone
  141. consists of a set of sections. By default, section and zone sizes are set to one
  142. segment size identically, but users can easily modify the sizes by mkfs.
  143. F2FS splits the entire volume into six areas, and all the areas except superblock
  144. consists of multiple segments as described below.
  145. align with the zone size <-|
  146. |-> align with the segment size
  147. _________________________________________________________________________
  148. | | | Segment | Node | Segment | |
  149. | Superblock | Checkpoint | Info. | Address | Summary | Main |
  150. | (SB) | (CP) | Table (SIT) | Table (NAT) | Area (SSA) | |
  151. |____________|_____2______|______N______|______N______|______N_____|__N___|
  152. . .
  153. . .
  154. . .
  155. ._________________________________________.
  156. |_Segment_|_..._|_Segment_|_..._|_Segment_|
  157. . .
  158. ._________._________
  159. |_section_|__...__|_
  160. . .
  161. .________.
  162. |__zone__|
  163. - Superblock (SB)
  164. : It is located at the beginning of the partition, and there exist two copies
  165. to avoid file system crash. It contains basic partition information and some
  166. default parameters of f2fs.
  167. - Checkpoint (CP)
  168. : It contains file system information, bitmaps for valid NAT/SIT sets, orphan
  169. inode lists, and summary entries of current active segments.
  170. - Segment Information Table (SIT)
  171. : It contains segment information such as valid block count and bitmap for the
  172. validity of all the blocks.
  173. - Node Address Table (NAT)
  174. : It is composed of a block address table for all the node blocks stored in
  175. Main area.
  176. - Segment Summary Area (SSA)
  177. : It contains summary entries which contains the owner information of all the
  178. data and node blocks stored in Main area.
  179. - Main Area
  180. : It contains file and directory data including their indices.
  181. In order to avoid misalignment between file system and flash-based storage, F2FS
  182. aligns the start block address of CP with the segment size. Also, it aligns the
  183. start block address of Main area with the zone size by reserving some segments
  184. in SSA area.
  185. Reference the following survey for additional technical details.
  186. https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Projects/FlashCardSurvey
  187. File System Metadata Structure
  188. ------------------------------
  189. F2FS adopts the checkpointing scheme to maintain file system consistency. At
  190. mount time, F2FS first tries to find the last valid checkpoint data by scanning
  191. CP area. In order to reduce the scanning time, F2FS uses only two copies of CP.
  192. One of them always indicates the last valid data, which is called as shadow copy
  193. mechanism. In addition to CP, NAT and SIT also adopt the shadow copy mechanism.
  194. For file system consistency, each CP points to which NAT and SIT copies are
  195. valid, as shown as below.
  196. +--------+----------+---------+
  197. | CP | SIT | NAT |
  198. +--------+----------+---------+
  199. . . . .
  200. . . . .
  201. . . . .
  202. +-------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
  203. | CP #0 | CP #1 | SIT #0 | SIT #1 | NAT #0 | NAT #1 |
  204. +-------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
  205. | ^ ^
  206. | | |
  207. `----------------------------------------'
  208. Index Structure
  209. ---------------
  210. The key data structure to manage the data locations is a "node". Similar to
  211. traditional file structures, F2FS has three types of node: inode, direct node,
  212. indirect node. F2FS assigns 4KB to an inode block which contains 923 data block
  213. indices, two direct node pointers, two indirect node pointers, and one double
  214. indirect node pointer as described below. One direct node block contains 1018
  215. data blocks, and one indirect node block contains also 1018 node blocks. Thus,
  216. one inode block (i.e., a file) covers:
  217. 4KB * (923 + 2 * 1018 + 2 * 1018 * 1018 + 1018 * 1018 * 1018) := 3.94TB.
  218. Inode block (4KB)
  219. |- data (923)
  220. |- direct node (2)
  221. | `- data (1018)
  222. |- indirect node (2)
  223. | `- direct node (1018)
  224. | `- data (1018)
  225. `- double indirect node (1)
  226. `- indirect node (1018)
  227. `- direct node (1018)
  228. `- data (1018)
  229. Note that, all the node blocks are mapped by NAT which means the location of
  230. each node is translated by the NAT table. In the consideration of the wandering
  231. tree problem, F2FS is able to cut off the propagation of node updates caused by
  232. leaf data writes.
  233. Directory Structure
  234. -------------------
  235. A directory entry occupies 11 bytes, which consists of the following attributes.
  236. - hash hash value of the file name
  237. - ino inode number
  238. - len the length of file name
  239. - type file type such as directory, symlink, etc
  240. A dentry block consists of 214 dentry slots and file names. Therein a bitmap is
  241. used to represent whether each dentry is valid or not. A dentry block occupies
  242. 4KB with the following composition.
  243. Dentry Block(4 K) = bitmap (27 bytes) + reserved (3 bytes) +
  244. dentries(11 * 214 bytes) + file name (8 * 214 bytes)
  245. [Bucket]
  246. +--------------------------------+
  247. |dentry block 1 | dentry block 2 |
  248. +--------------------------------+
  249. . .
  250. . .
  251. . [Dentry Block Structure: 4KB] .
  252. +--------+----------+----------+------------+
  253. | bitmap | reserved | dentries | file names |
  254. +--------+----------+----------+------------+
  255. [Dentry Block: 4KB] . .
  256. . .
  257. . .
  258. +------+------+-----+------+
  259. | hash | ino | len | type |
  260. +------+------+-----+------+
  261. [Dentry Structure: 11 bytes]
  262. F2FS implements multi-level hash tables for directory structure. Each level has
  263. a hash table with dedicated number of hash buckets as shown below. Note that
  264. "A(2B)" means a bucket includes 2 data blocks.
  265. ----------------------
  266. A : bucket
  267. B : block
  268. N : MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH
  269. ----------------------
  270. level #0 | A(2B)
  271. |
  272. level #1 | A(2B) - A(2B)
  273. |
  274. level #2 | A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B)
  275. . | . . . .
  276. level #N/2 | A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - ... - A(2B)
  277. . | . . . .
  278. level #N | A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - ... - A(4B)
  279. The number of blocks and buckets are determined by,
  280. ,- 2, if n < MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2,
  281. # of blocks in level #n = |
  282. `- 4, Otherwise
  283. ,- 2^n, if n < MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2,
  284. # of buckets in level #n = |
  285. `- 2^((MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2) - 1), Otherwise
  286. When F2FS finds a file name in a directory, at first a hash value of the file
  287. name is calculated. Then, F2FS scans the hash table in level #0 to find the
  288. dentry consisting of the file name and its inode number. If not found, F2FS
  289. scans the next hash table in level #1. In this way, F2FS scans hash tables in
  290. each levels incrementally from 1 to N. In each levels F2FS needs to scan only
  291. one bucket determined by the following equation, which shows O(log(# of files))
  292. complexity.
  293. bucket number to scan in level #n = (hash value) % (# of buckets in level #n)
  294. In the case of file creation, F2FS finds empty consecutive slots that cover the
  295. file name. F2FS searches the empty slots in the hash tables of whole levels from
  296. 1 to N in the same way as the lookup operation.
  297. The following figure shows an example of two cases holding children.
  298. --------------> Dir <--------------
  299. | |
  300. child child
  301. child - child [hole] - child
  302. child - child - child [hole] - [hole] - child
  303. Case 1: Case 2:
  304. Number of children = 6, Number of children = 3,
  305. File size = 7 File size = 7
  306. Default Block Allocation
  307. ------------------------
  308. At runtime, F2FS manages six active logs inside "Main" area: Hot/Warm/Cold node
  309. and Hot/Warm/Cold data.
  310. - Hot node contains direct node blocks of directories.
  311. - Warm node contains direct node blocks except hot node blocks.
  312. - Cold node contains indirect node blocks
  313. - Hot data contains dentry blocks
  314. - Warm data contains data blocks except hot and cold data blocks
  315. - Cold data contains multimedia data or migrated data blocks
  316. LFS has two schemes for free space management: threaded log and copy-and-compac-
  317. tion. The copy-and-compaction scheme which is known as cleaning, is well-suited
  318. for devices showing very good sequential write performance, since free segments
  319. are served all the time for writing new data. However, it suffers from cleaning
  320. overhead under high utilization. Contrarily, the threaded log scheme suffers
  321. from random writes, but no cleaning process is needed. F2FS adopts a hybrid
  322. scheme where the copy-and-compaction scheme is adopted by default, but the
  323. policy is dynamically changed to the threaded log scheme according to the file
  324. system status.
  325. In order to align F2FS with underlying flash-based storage, F2FS allocates a
  326. segment in a unit of section. F2FS expects that the section size would be the
  327. same as the unit size of garbage collection in FTL. Furthermore, with respect
  328. to the mapping granularity in FTL, F2FS allocates each section of the active
  329. logs from different zones as much as possible, since FTL can write the data in
  330. the active logs into one allocation unit according to its mapping granularity.
  331. Cleaning process
  332. ----------------
  333. F2FS does cleaning both on demand and in the background. On-demand cleaning is
  334. triggered when there are not enough free segments to serve VFS calls. Background
  335. cleaner is operated by a kernel thread, and triggers the cleaning job when the
  336. system is idle.
  337. F2FS supports two victim selection policies: greedy and cost-benefit algorithms.
  338. In the greedy algorithm, F2FS selects a victim segment having the smallest number
  339. of valid blocks. In the cost-benefit algorithm, F2FS selects a victim segment
  340. according to the segment age and the number of valid blocks in order to address
  341. log block thrashing problem in the greedy algorithm. F2FS adopts the greedy
  342. algorithm for on-demand cleaner, while background cleaner adopts cost-benefit
  343. algorithm.
  344. In order to identify whether the data in the victim segment are valid or not,
  345. F2FS manages a bitmap. Each bit represents the validity of a block, and the
  346. bitmap is composed of a bit stream covering whole blocks in main area.