123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324 |
- Remote Processor Framework
- 1. Introduction
- Modern SoCs typically have heterogeneous remote processor devices in asymmetric
- multiprocessing (AMP) configurations, which may be running different instances
- of operating system, whether it's Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
- OMAP4, for example, has dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP.
- In a typical configuration, the dual cortex-A9 is running Linux in a SMP
- configuration, and each of the other three cores (two M3 cores and a DSP)
- is running its own instance of RTOS in an AMP configuration.
- The remoteproc framework allows different platforms/architectures to
- control (power on, load firmware, power off) those remote processors while
- abstracting the hardware differences, so the entire driver doesn't need to be
- duplicated. In addition, this framework also adds rpmsg virtio devices
- for remote processors that supports this kind of communication. This way,
- platform-specific remoteproc drivers only need to provide a few low-level
- handlers, and then all rpmsg drivers will then just work
- (for more information about the virtio-based rpmsg bus and its drivers,
- please read Documentation/rpmsg.txt).
- 2. User API
- int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Boot a remote processor (i.e. load its firmware, power it on, ...).
- If the remote processor is already powered on, this function immediately
- returns (successfully).
- Returns 0 on success, and an appropriate error value otherwise.
- Note: to use this function you should already have a valid rproc
- handle. There are several ways to achieve that cleanly (devres, pdata,
- the way remoteproc_rpmsg.c does this, or, if this becomes prevalent, we
- might also consider using dev_archdata for this). See also
- rproc_get_by_name() below.
- void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Power off a remote processor (previously booted with rproc_boot()).
- In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
- this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
- without really powering off the device.
- Every call to rproc_boot() must (eventually) be accompanied by a call
- to rproc_shutdown(). Calling rproc_shutdown() redundantly is a bug.
- Notes:
- - we're not decrementing the rproc's refcount, only the power refcount.
- which means that the @rproc handle stays valid even after
- rproc_shutdown() returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent
- rproc_boot(), if needed.
- - don't call rproc_shutdown() to unroll rproc_get_by_name(), exactly
- because rproc_shutdown() _does not_ decrement the refcount of @rproc.
- To decrement the refcount of @rproc, use rproc_put() (but _only_ if
- you acquired @rproc using rproc_get_by_name()).
- struct rproc *rproc_get_by_name(const char *name)
- - Find an rproc handle using the remote processor's name, and then
- boot it. If it's already powered on, then just immediately return
- (successfully). Returns the rproc handle on success, and NULL on failure.
- This function increments the remote processor's refcount, so always
- use rproc_put() to decrement it back once rproc isn't needed anymore.
- Note: currently rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put() are not used anymore
- by the rpmsg bus and its drivers. We need to scrutinize the use cases
- that still need them, and see if we can migrate them to use the non
- name-based boot/shutdown interface.
- void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Decrement @rproc's power refcount and shut it down if it reaches zero
- (essentially by just calling rproc_shutdown), and then decrement @rproc's
- validity refcount too.
- After this function returns, @rproc may _not_ be used anymore, and its
- handle should be considered invalid.
- This function should be called _iff_ the @rproc handle was grabbed by
- calling rproc_get_by_name().
- 3. Typical usage
- #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
- /* in case we were given a valid 'rproc' handle */
- int dummy_rproc_example(struct rproc *my_rproc)
- {
- int ret;
- /* let's power on and boot our remote processor */
- ret = rproc_boot(my_rproc);
- if (ret) {
- /*
- * something went wrong. handle it and leave.
- */
- }
- /*
- * our remote processor is now powered on... give it some work
- */
- /* let's shut it down now */
- rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
- }
- 4. API for implementors
- struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
- const struct rproc_ops *ops,
- const char *firmware, int len)
- - Allocate a new remote processor handle, but don't register
- it yet. Required parameters are the underlying device, the
- name of this remote processor, platform-specific ops handlers,
- the name of the firmware to boot this rproc with, and the
- length of private data needed by the allocating rproc driver (in bytes).
- This function should be used by rproc implementations during
- initialization of the remote processor.
- After creating an rproc handle using this function, and when ready,
- implementations should then call rproc_register() to complete
- the registration of the remote processor.
- On success, the new rproc is returned, and on failure, NULL.
- Note: _never_ directly deallocate @rproc, even if it was not registered
- yet. Instead, if you just need to unroll rproc_alloc(), use rproc_free().
- void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Free an rproc handle that was allocated by rproc_alloc.
- This function should _only_ be used if @rproc was only allocated,
- but not registered yet.
- If @rproc was already successfully registered (by calling
- rproc_register()), then use rproc_unregister() instead.
- int rproc_register(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Register @rproc with the remoteproc framework, after it has been
- allocated with rproc_alloc().
- This is called by the platform-specific rproc implementation, whenever
- a new remote processor device is probed.
- Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
- Note: this function initiates an asynchronous firmware loading
- context, which will look for virtio devices supported by the rproc's
- firmware.
- If found, those virtio devices will be created and added, so as a result
- of registering this remote processor, additional virtio drivers might get
- probed.
- Currently, though, we only support a single RPMSG virtio vdev per remote
- processor.
- int rproc_unregister(struct rproc *rproc)
- - Unregister a remote processor, and decrement its refcount.
- If its refcount drops to zero, then @rproc will be freed. If not,
- it will be freed later once the last reference is dropped.
- This function should be called when the platform specific rproc
- implementation decides to remove the rproc device. it should
- _only_ be called if a previous invocation of rproc_register()
- has completed successfully.
- After rproc_unregister() returns, @rproc is _not_ valid anymore and
- it shouldn't be used. More specifically, don't call rproc_free()
- or try to directly free @rproc after rproc_unregister() returns;
- none of these are needed, and calling them is a bug.
- Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
- 5. Implementation callbacks
- These callbacks should be provided by platform-specific remoteproc
- drivers:
- /**
- * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
- * @start: power on the device and boot it
- * @stop: power off the device
- * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
- */
- struct rproc_ops {
- int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
- int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
- void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
- };
- Every remoteproc implementation should at least provide the ->start and ->stop
- handlers. If rpmsg functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler
- should be provided as well.
- The ->start() handler takes an rproc handle and should then power on the
- device and boot it (use rproc->priv to access platform-specific private data).
- The boot address, in case needed, can be found in rproc->bootaddr (remoteproc
- core puts there the ELF entry point).
- On success, 0 should be returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
- The ->stop() handler takes an rproc handle and powers the device down.
- On success, 0 is returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
- The ->kick() handler takes an rproc handle, and an index of a virtqueue
- where new message was placed in. Implementations should interrupt the remote
- processor and let it know it has pending messages. Notifying remote processors
- the exact virtqueue index to look in is optional: it is easy (and not
- too expensive) to go through the existing virtqueues and look for new buffers
- in the used rings.
- 6. Binary Firmware Structure
- At this point remoteproc only supports ELF32 firmware binaries. However,
- it is quite expected that other platforms/devices which we'd want to
- support with this framework will be based on different binary formats.
- When those use cases show up, we will have to decouple the binary format
- from the framework core, so we can support several binary formats without
- duplicating common code.
- When the firmware is parsed, its various segments are loaded to memory
- according to the specified device address (might be a physical address
- if the remote processor is accessing memory directly).
- In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would
- also include a special section which we call "the resource table".
- The resource table contains system resources that the remote processor
- requires before it should be powered on, such as allocation of physically
- contiguous memory, or iommu mapping of certain on-chip peripherals.
- Remotecore will only power up the device after all the resource table's
- requirement are met.
- In addition to system resources, the resource table may also contain
- resource entries that publish the existence of supported features
- or configurations by the remote processor, such as trace buffers and
- supported virtio devices (and their configurations).
- Currently the resource table is just an array of:
- /**
- * struct fw_resource - describes an entry from the resource section
- * @type: resource type
- * @id: index number of the resource
- * @da: device address of the resource
- * @pa: physical address of the resource
- * @len: size, in bytes, of the resource
- * @flags: properties of the resource, e.g. iommu protection required
- * @reserved: must be 0 atm
- * @name: name of resource
- */
- struct fw_resource {
- u32 type;
- u32 id;
- u64 da;
- u64 pa;
- u32 len;
- u32 flags;
- u8 reserved[16];
- u8 name[48];
- } __packed;
- Some resources entries are mere announcements, where the host is informed
- of specific remoteproc configuration. Other entries require the host to
- do something (e.g. reserve a requested resource) and possibly also reply
- by overwriting a member inside 'struct fw_resource' with info about the
- allocated resource.
- Different resource entries use different members of this struct,
- with different meanings. This is pretty limiting and error-prone,
- so the plan is to move to variable-length TLV-based resource entries,
- where each resource will begin with a type and length fields, followed by
- its own specific structure.
- Here are the resource types that are currently being used:
- /**
- * enum fw_resource_type - types of resource entries
- *
- * @RSC_CARVEOUT: request for allocation of a physically contiguous
- * memory region.
- * @RSC_DEVMEM: request to iommu_map a memory-based peripheral.
- * @RSC_TRACE: announces the availability of a trace buffer into which
- * the remote processor will be writing logs. In this case,
- * 'da' indicates the device address where logs are written to,
- * and 'len' is the size of the trace buffer.
- * @RSC_VRING: request for allocation of a virtio vring (address should
- * be indicated in 'da', and 'len' should contain the number
- * of buffers supported by the vring).
- * @RSC_VIRTIO_DEV: announces support for a virtio device, and serves as
- * the virtio header. 'da' contains the virtio device
- * features, 'pa' holds the virtio guest features (host
- * will write them here after they're negotiated), 'len'
- * holds the virtio status, and 'flags' holds the virtio
- * device id (currently only VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG is supported).
- */
- enum fw_resource_type {
- RSC_CARVEOUT = 0,
- RSC_DEVMEM = 1,
- RSC_TRACE = 2,
- RSC_VRING = 3,
- RSC_VIRTIO_DEV = 4,
- RSC_VIRTIO_CFG = 5,
- };
- Most of the resource entries share the basic idea of address/length
- negotiation with the host: the firmware usually asks for memory
- of size 'len' bytes, and the host needs to allocate it and provide
- the device/physical address (when relevant) in 'da'/'pa' respectively.
- If the firmware is compiled with hard coded device addresses, and
- can't handle dynamically allocated 'da' values, then the 'da' field
- will contain the expected device addresses (today we actually only support
- this scheme, as there aren't yet any use cases for dynamically allocated
- device addresses).
- We also expect that platform-specific resource entries will show up
- at some point. When that happens, we could easily add a new RSC_PLAFORM
- type, and hand those resources to the platform-specific rproc driver to handle.
- 7. Virtio and remoteproc
- The firmware should provide remoteproc information about virtio devices
- that it supports, and their configurations: a RSC_VIRTIO_DEV resource entry
- should specify the virtio device id, and subsequent RSC_VRING resource entries
- should indicate the vring size (i.e. how many buffers do they support) and
- where should they be mapped (i.e. which device address). Note: the alignment
- between the consumer and producer parts of the vring is assumed to be 4096.
- At this point we only support a single virtio rpmsg device per remote
- processor, but the plan is to remove this limitation. In addition, once we
- move to TLV-based resource table, the plan is to have a single RSC_VIRTIO
- entry per supported virtio device, which will include the virtio header,
- the vrings information and the virtio config space.
- Of course, RSC_VIRTIO resource entries are only good enough for static
- allocation of virtio devices. Dynamic allocations will also be made possible
- using the rpmsg bus (similar to how we already do dynamic allocations of
- rpmsg channels; read more about it in rpmsg.txt).
|