소스 검색

[MTD] Don't let gcc inline functions marked __xipram

If they get inlined into non __xipram functions we're screwed.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Nicolas Pitre 19 년 전
부모
커밋
fb0258730a
1개의 변경된 파일8개의 추가작업 그리고 8개의 파일을 삭제
  1. 8 8
      include/linux/mtd/xip.h

+ 8 - 8
include/linux/mtd/xip.h

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
  * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  *
- * $Id: xip.h,v 1.2 2004/12/01 15:49:10 nico Exp $
+ * $Id: xip.h,v 1.4 2005/10/17 21:03:16 nico Exp $
  */
 
 #ifndef __LINUX_MTD_XIP_H__
@@ -22,19 +22,19 @@
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MTD_XIP
 
-/*
- * Function that are modifying the flash state away from array mode must
- * obviously not be running from flash.  The __xipram is therefore marking
- * those functions so they get relocated to ram.
- */
-#define __xipram __attribute__ ((__section__ (".data")))
-
 /*
  * We really don't want gcc to guess anything.
  * We absolutely _need_ proper inlining.
  */
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 
+/*
+ * Function that are modifying the flash state away from array mode must
+ * obviously not be running from flash.  The __xipram is therefore marking
+ * those functions so they get relocated to ram.
+ */
+#define __xipram noinline __attribute__ ((__section__ (".data")))
+
 /*
  * Each architecture has to provide the following macros.  They must access
  * the hardware directly and not rely on any other (XIP) functions since they