|
@@ -135,17 +135,15 @@ int nfs4_path_walk(struct nfs_server *server,
|
|
|
struct nfs_fh lastfh;
|
|
|
struct qstr name;
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
- //int referral_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
dprintk("--> nfs4_path_walk(,,%s)\n", path);
|
|
|
|
|
|
fsinfo.fattr = &fattr;
|
|
|
nfs_fattr_init(&fattr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if (*path++ != '/') {
|
|
|
- dprintk("nfs4_get_root: Path does not begin with a slash\n");
|
|
|
- return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ /* Eat leading slashes */
|
|
|
+ while (*path == '/')
|
|
|
+ path++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Start by getting the root filehandle from the server */
|
|
|
ret = server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->getroot(server, mntfh, &fsinfo);
|
|
@@ -160,6 +158,7 @@ int nfs4_path_walk(struct nfs_server *server,
|
|
|
return -ENOTDIR;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* FIXME: It is quite valid for the server to return a referral here */
|
|
|
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
|
|
|
" getroot obtained referral\n");
|
|
@@ -187,6 +186,7 @@ eat_dot_dir:
|
|
|
goto eat_dot_dir;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* FIXME: Why shouldn't the user be able to use ".." in the path? */
|
|
|
if (path[0] == '.' && path[1] == '.' && (path[2] == '/' || !path[2])
|
|
|
) {
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
|
|
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ eat_dot_dir:
|
|
|
return -ENOTDIR;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* FIXME: Referrals are quite valid here too */
|
|
|
if (fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_REFERRAL) {
|
|
|
printk(KERN_ERR "nfs4_get_root:"
|
|
|
" lookupfh obtained referral\n");
|