|
@@ -2640,22 +2640,22 @@ recheck:
|
|
|
/* if we're blocking an exclusive and we have *any* holders,
|
|
|
* then requeue. */
|
|
|
if ((lockres->l_blocking == LKM_EXMODE)
|
|
|
- && (lockres->l_ex_holders || lockres->l_ro_holders)) {
|
|
|
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
|
|
|
- ctl->requeue = 1;
|
|
|
- ret = 0;
|
|
|
- goto leave;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ && (lockres->l_ex_holders || lockres->l_ro_holders))
|
|
|
+ goto leave_requeue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If it's a PR we're blocking, then only
|
|
|
* requeue if we've got any EX holders */
|
|
|
if (lockres->l_blocking == LKM_PRMODE &&
|
|
|
- lockres->l_ex_holders) {
|
|
|
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
|
|
|
- ctl->requeue = 1;
|
|
|
- ret = 0;
|
|
|
- goto leave;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ lockres->l_ex_holders)
|
|
|
+ goto leave_requeue;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * Can we get a lock in this state if the holder counts are
|
|
|
+ * zero? The meta data unblock code used to check this.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if ((lockres->l_ops->flags & LOCK_TYPE_REQUIRES_REFRESH)
|
|
|
+ && (lockres->l_flags & OCFS2_LOCK_REFRESHING))
|
|
|
+ goto leave_requeue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If we get here, then we know that there are no more
|
|
|
* incompatible holders (and anyone asking for an incompatible
|
|
@@ -2692,6 +2692,13 @@ downconvert:
|
|
|
leave:
|
|
|
mlog_exit(ret);
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+leave_requeue:
|
|
|
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lockres->l_lock, flags);
|
|
|
+ ctl->requeue = 1;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ mlog_exit(0);
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int ocfs2_data_convert_worker(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
|