浏览代码

ptrace: revert "ptrace_detach: the wrong wakeup breaks the ERESTARTxxx logic"

Commit 95a3540da9c81a5987be810e1d9a83640a366bd5 ("ptrace_detach: the wrong
wakeup breaks the ERESTARTxxx logic") removed the "extra"
wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach(), but as Jan pointed out this breaks
the compatibility.

I believe the changelog is right and this wake_up() is wrong in many
ways, but GDB assumes that ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child, 0, 0) always
wakes up the tracee.

Despite the fact this breaks SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED/group_stop_count logic,
and despite the fact this wake_up_process() can break another
assumption: PTRACE_DETACH with SIGSTOP should leave the tracee in
TASK_STOPPED case.  Because the untraced child can dequeue SIGSTOP and
call do_signal_stop() before ptrace_detach() calls wake_up_process().

Revert this change for now.  We need some fixes even if we we want to keep
the current behaviour, but these fixes are not for 2.6.30.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Oleg Nesterov 16 年之前
父节点
当前提交
edaba2c533
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入0 次删除
  1. 2 0
      kernel/ptrace.c

+ 2 - 0
kernel/ptrace.c

@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ int ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *child, unsigned int data)
 	if (child->ptrace) {
 	if (child->ptrace) {
 		child->exit_code = data;
 		child->exit_code = data;
 		dead = __ptrace_detach(current, child);
 		dead = __ptrace_detach(current, child);
+		if (!child->exit_state)
+			wake_up_process(child);
 	}
 	}
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);