|
@@ -26,64 +26,66 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from,
|
|
|
short same_lci = 0;
|
|
|
int rc = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) != NULL) {
|
|
|
+ if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) == NULL)
|
|
|
+ goto out_no_route;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) {
|
|
|
- /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow
|
|
|
- * do something sensible
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- goto out_put_route;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a
|
|
|
- * system with only one x.25 iface and default route
|
|
|
+ if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) {
|
|
|
+ /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow
|
|
|
+ * do something sensible
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- if (rt->dev == from->dev) {
|
|
|
- goto out_put_nb;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ goto out_put_route;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* Remote end sending a call request on an already
|
|
|
- * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case..
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
- list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
|
|
|
- x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
|
|
|
- if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) {
|
|
|
- printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n");
|
|
|
- same_lci = 1;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */
|
|
|
- if (!same_lci){
|
|
|
- if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward),
|
|
|
- GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
|
|
|
- rc = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
- goto out_put_nb;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- new_frwd->lci = lci;
|
|
|
- new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev;
|
|
|
- new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev;
|
|
|
- write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
- list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list);
|
|
|
- write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
+ /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a
|
|
|
+ * system with only one x.25 iface and default route
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (rt->dev == from->dev) {
|
|
|
+ goto out_put_nb;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* Remote end sending a call request on an already
|
|
|
+ * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case..
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
+ list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
|
|
|
+ x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
|
|
|
+ if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n");
|
|
|
+ same_lci = 1;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* Forward the call request */
|
|
|
- if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
|
|
|
+ /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */
|
|
|
+ if (!same_lci){
|
|
|
+ if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward),
|
|
|
+ GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
|
|
|
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
goto out_put_nb;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
- x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new);
|
|
|
- rc = 1;
|
|
|
+ new_frwd->lci = lci;
|
|
|
+ new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev;
|
|
|
+ new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev;
|
|
|
+ write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
+ list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list);
|
|
|
+ write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* Forward the call request */
|
|
|
+ if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
|
|
|
+ goto out_put_nb;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new);
|
|
|
+ rc = 1;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
out_put_nb:
|
|
|
x25_neigh_put(neigh_new);
|
|
|
|
|
|
out_put_route:
|
|
|
x25_route_put(rt);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+out_no_route:
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|