Ver código fonte

ASoC: Sort specialised mixers and muxes together

The more flexible value muxes and named mixers don't need to be sorted
differently from a power management point of view, they are different
only in terms of the control interface and not in terms of seqencing
behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Mark Brown 16 anos atrás
pai
commit
e3d4dabd2d
1 arquivos alterados com 17 adições e 17 exclusões
  1. 17 17
      sound/soc/soc-dapm.c

+ 17 - 17
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c

@@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ static int dapm_up_seq[] = {
 	[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 2,
 	[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 3,
 	[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 4,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 5,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 7,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 8,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 9,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 10,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 11,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 12,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 4,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 5,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 6,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 7,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 8,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 9,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 10,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
 };
 
 static int dapm_down_seq[] = {
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ static int dapm_down_seq[] = {
 	[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 3,
 	[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 4,
 	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 5,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 7,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 8,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 9,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 10,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 11,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 12,
-	[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 5,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 7,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 8,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 9,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 9,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 10,
+	[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
 };
 
 static void pop_wait(u32 pop_time)