Ver Fonte

libata-sff: Fix documentation

Code moved to ioread/iowrite but the comment didn't
Also note a posting issue

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Alan Cox há 17 anos atrás
pai
commit
e1cc9de836
1 ficheiros alterados com 4 adições e 1 exclusões
  1. 4 1
      drivers/ata/libata-sff.c

+ 4 - 1
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c

@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ void ata_bmdma_start (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 	dmactl = ioread8(ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
 	iowrite8(dmactl | ATA_DMA_START, ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
 
-	/* Strictly, one may wish to issue a readb() here, to
+	/* Strictly, one may wish to issue an ioread8() here, to
 	 * flush the mmio write.  However, control also passes
 	 * to the hardware at this point, and it will interrupt
 	 * us when we are to resume control.  So, in effect,
@@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ void ata_bmdma_start (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 	 * is expected, so I think it is best to not add a readb()
 	 * without first all the MMIO ATA cards/mobos.
 	 * Or maybe I'm just being paranoid.
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: The posting of this write means I/O starts are
+	 * unneccessarily delayed for MMIO
 	 */
 }