Browse Source

x86_64: Don't use softirq safe locks in smp_call_function

It is not fully softirq safe anyways.

Can't do a WARN_ON unfortunately because it could trigger in the
panic case.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Andi Kleen 18 years ago
parent
commit
d9c6d69145
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
  1. 2 2
      arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c

+ 2 - 2
arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c

@@ -386,9 +386,9 @@ int smp_call_function_single (int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&call_lock);
+	spin_lock(&call_lock);
 	__smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, nonatomic, wait);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&call_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&call_lock);
 	put_cpu();
 	return 0;
 }