|
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static int fqs_duration; /* Duration of bursts (us), 0 to disable. */
|
|
|
static int fqs_holdoff; /* Hold time within burst (us). */
|
|
|
static int fqs_stutter = 3; /* Wait time between bursts (s). */
|
|
|
static int n_barrier_cbs; /* Number of callbacks to test RCU barriers. */
|
|
|
+static int object_debug; /* Test object-debug double call_rcu()?. */
|
|
|
static int onoff_interval; /* Wait time between CPU hotplugs, 0=disable. */
|
|
|
static int onoff_holdoff; /* Seconds after boot before CPU hotplugs. */
|
|
|
static int shutdown_secs; /* Shutdown time (s). <=0 for no shutdown. */
|
|
@@ -100,6 +101,8 @@ module_param(fqs_stutter, int, 0444);
|
|
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(fqs_stutter, "Wait time between fqs bursts (s)");
|
|
|
module_param(n_barrier_cbs, int, 0444);
|
|
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(n_barrier_cbs, "# of callbacks/kthreads for barrier testing");
|
|
|
+module_param(object_debug, int, 0444);
|
|
|
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(object_debug, "Enable debug-object double call_rcu() testing");
|
|
|
module_param(onoff_interval, int, 0444);
|
|
|
MODULE_PARM_DESC(onoff_interval, "Time between CPU hotplugs (s), 0=disable");
|
|
|
module_param(onoff_holdoff, int, 0444);
|
|
@@ -1934,6 +1937,62 @@ rcu_torture_cleanup(void)
|
|
|
rcu_torture_print_module_parms(cur_ops, "End of test: SUCCESS");
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
|
|
|
+static void rcu_torture_leak_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+static void rcu_torture_err_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * This -might- happen due to race conditions, but is unlikely.
|
|
|
+ * The scenario that leads to this happening is that the
|
|
|
+ * first of the pair of duplicate callbacks is queued,
|
|
|
+ * someone else starts a grace period that includes that
|
|
|
+ * callback, then the second of the pair must wait for the
|
|
|
+ * next grace period. Unlikely, but can happen. If it
|
|
|
+ * does happen, the debug-objects subsystem won't have splatted.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ pr_alert("rcutorture: duplicated callback was invoked.\n");
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD */
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+/*
|
|
|
+ * Verify that double-free causes debug-objects to complain, but only
|
|
|
+ * if CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y. Otherwise, say that the test
|
|
|
+ * cannot be carried out.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+static void rcu_test_debug_objects(void)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
|
|
|
+ struct rcu_head rh1;
|
|
|
+ struct rcu_head rh2;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh1);
|
|
|
+ init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh2);
|
|
|
+ pr_alert("rcutorture: WARN: Duplicate call_rcu() test starting.\n");
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* Try to queue the rh2 pair of callbacks for the same grace period. */
|
|
|
+ preempt_disable(); /* Prevent preemption from interrupting test. */
|
|
|
+ rcu_read_lock(); /* Make it impossible to finish a grace period. */
|
|
|
+ call_rcu(&rh1, rcu_torture_leak_cb); /* Start grace period. */
|
|
|
+ local_irq_disable(); /* Make it harder to start a new grace period. */
|
|
|
+ call_rcu(&rh2, rcu_torture_leak_cb);
|
|
|
+ call_rcu(&rh2, rcu_torture_err_cb); /* Duplicate callback. */
|
|
|
+ local_irq_enable();
|
|
|
+ rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
+ preempt_enable();
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* Wait for them all to get done so we can safely return. */
|
|
|
+ rcu_barrier();
|
|
|
+ pr_alert("rcutorture: WARN: Duplicate call_rcu() test complete.\n");
|
|
|
+ destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh1);
|
|
|
+ destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh2);
|
|
|
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD */
|
|
|
+ pr_alert("rcutorture: !CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD, not testing duplicate call_rcu()\n");
|
|
|
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD */
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
static int __init
|
|
|
rcu_torture_init(void)
|
|
|
{
|
|
@@ -2163,6 +2222,8 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
|
|
|
firsterr = retval;
|
|
|
goto unwind;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
+ if (object_debug)
|
|
|
+ rcu_test_debug_objects();
|
|
|
rcutorture_record_test_transition();
|
|
|
mutex_unlock(&fullstop_mutex);
|
|
|
return 0;
|