Browse Source

[S390] vmcp cleanup

No need to use the "&" prefix and, since you're calling nonseekable_open(),
there is no need to use no_llseek().

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Robert P. J. Day 18 years ago
parent
commit
d197e69218
1 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions
  1. 6 7
      drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c

+ 6 - 7
drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c

@@ -175,13 +175,12 @@ static long vmcp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 
 
 static const struct file_operations vmcp_fops = {
 static const struct file_operations vmcp_fops = {
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
-	.open		= &vmcp_open,
-	.release	= &vmcp_release,
-	.read		= &vmcp_read,
-	.llseek		= &no_llseek,
-	.write		= &vmcp_write,
-	.unlocked_ioctl	= &vmcp_ioctl,
-	.compat_ioctl	= &vmcp_ioctl
+	.open		= vmcp_open,
+	.release	= vmcp_release,
+	.read		= vmcp_read,
+	.write		= vmcp_write,
+	.unlocked_ioctl	= vmcp_ioctl,
+	.compat_ioctl	= vmcp_ioctl
 };
 };
 
 
 static struct miscdevice vmcp_dev = {
 static struct miscdevice vmcp_dev = {