|
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
|
|
|
|
+ Power Management for USB
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ October 5, 2007
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ What is Power Management?
|
|
|
|
+ -------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Power Management (PM) is the practice of saving energy by suspending
|
|
|
|
+parts of a computer system when they aren't being used. While a
|
|
|
|
+component is "suspended" it is in a nonfunctional low-power state; it
|
|
|
|
+might even be turned off completely. A suspended component can be
|
|
|
|
+"resumed" (returned to a functional full-power state) when the kernel
|
|
|
|
+needs to use it. (There also are forms of PM in which components are
|
|
|
|
+placed in a less functional but still usable state instead of being
|
|
|
|
+suspended; an example would be reducing the CPU's clock rate. This
|
|
|
|
+document will not discuss those other forms.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+When the parts being suspended include the CPU and most of the rest of
|
|
|
|
+the system, we speak of it as a "system suspend". When a particular
|
|
|
|
+device is turned off while the system as a whole remains running, we
|
|
|
|
+call it a "dynamic suspend" (also known as a "runtime suspend" or
|
|
|
|
+"selective suspend"). This document concentrates mostly on how
|
|
|
|
+dynamic PM is implemented in the USB subsystem, although system PM is
|
|
|
|
+covered to some extent (see Documentation/power/*.txt for more
|
|
|
|
+information about system PM).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Note: Dynamic PM support for USB is present only if the kernel was
|
|
|
|
+built with CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND enabled. System PM support is present
|
|
|
|
+only if the kernel was built with CONFIG_SUSPEND or CONFIG_HIBERNATION
|
|
|
|
+enabled.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ What is Remote Wakeup?
|
|
|
|
+ ----------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+When a device has been suspended, it generally doesn't resume until
|
|
|
|
+the computer tells it to. Likewise, if the entire computer has been
|
|
|
|
+suspended, it generally doesn't resume until the user tells it to, say
|
|
|
|
+by pressing a power button or opening the cover.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+However some devices have the capability of resuming by themselves, or
|
|
|
|
+asking the kernel to resume them, or even telling the entire computer
|
|
|
|
+to resume. This capability goes by several names such as "Wake On
|
|
|
|
+LAN"; we will refer to it generically as "remote wakeup". When a
|
|
|
|
+device is enabled for remote wakeup and it is suspended, it may resume
|
|
|
|
+itself (or send a request to be resumed) in response to some external
|
|
|
|
+event. Examples include a suspended keyboard resuming when a key is
|
|
|
|
+pressed, or a suspended USB hub resuming when a device is plugged in.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ When is a USB device idle?
|
|
|
|
+ --------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+A device is idle whenever the kernel thinks it's not busy doing
|
|
|
|
+anything important and thus is a candidate for being suspended. The
|
|
|
|
+exact definition depends on the device's driver; drivers are allowed
|
|
|
|
+to declare that a device isn't idle even when there's no actual
|
|
|
|
+communication taking place. (For example, a hub isn't considered idle
|
|
|
|
+unless all the devices plugged into that hub are already suspended.)
|
|
|
|
+In addition, a device isn't considered idle so long as a program keeps
|
|
|
|
+its usbfs file open, whether or not any I/O is going on.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+If a USB device has no driver, its usbfs file isn't open, and it isn't
|
|
|
|
+being accessed through sysfs, then it definitely is idle.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Forms of dynamic PM
|
|
|
|
+ -------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Dynamic suspends can occur in two ways: manual and automatic.
|
|
|
|
+"Manual" means that the user has told the kernel to suspend a device,
|
|
|
|
+whereas "automatic" means that the kernel has decided all by itself to
|
|
|
|
+suspend a device. Automatic suspend is called "autosuspend" for
|
|
|
|
+short. In general, a device won't be autosuspended unless it has been
|
|
|
|
+idle for some minimum period of time, the so-called idle-delay time.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Of course, nothing the kernel does on its own initiative should
|
|
|
|
+prevent the computer or its devices from working properly. If a
|
|
|
|
+device has been autosuspended and a program tries to use it, the
|
|
|
|
+kernel will automatically resume the device (autoresume). For the
|
|
|
|
+same reason, an autosuspended device will usually have remote wakeup
|
|
|
|
+enabled, if the device supports remote wakeup.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+It is worth mentioning that many USB drivers don't support
|
|
|
|
+autosuspend. In fact, at the time of this writing (Linux 2.6.23) the
|
|
|
|
+only drivers which do support it are the hub driver, kaweth, asix,
|
|
|
|
+usblp, usblcd, and usb-skeleton (which doesn't count). If a
|
|
|
|
+non-supporting driver is bound to a device, the device won't be
|
|
|
|
+autosuspended. In effect, the kernel pretends the device is never
|
|
|
|
+idle.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+We can categorize power management events in two broad classes:
|
|
|
|
+external and internal. External events are those triggered by some
|
|
|
|
+agent outside the USB stack: system suspend/resume (triggered by
|
|
|
|
+userspace), manual dynamic suspend/resume (also triggered by
|
|
|
|
+userspace), and remote wakeup (triggered by the device). Internal
|
|
|
|
+events are those triggered within the USB stack: autosuspend and
|
|
|
|
+autoresume.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The user interface for dynamic PM
|
|
|
|
+ ---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The user interface for controlling dynamic PM is located in the power/
|
|
|
|
+subdirectory of each USB device's sysfs directory, that is, in
|
|
|
|
+/sys/bus/usb/devices/.../power/ where "..." is the device's ID. The
|
|
|
|
+relevant attribute files are: wakeup, level, and autosuspend.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ power/wakeup
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ This file is empty if the device does not support
|
|
|
|
+ remote wakeup. Otherwise the file contains either the
|
|
|
|
+ word "enabled" or the word "disabled", and you can
|
|
|
|
+ write those words to the file. The setting determines
|
|
|
|
+ whether or not remote wakeup will be enabled when the
|
|
|
|
+ device is next suspended. (If the setting is changed
|
|
|
|
+ while the device is suspended, the change won't take
|
|
|
|
+ effect until the following suspend.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ power/level
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ This file contains one of three words: "on", "auto",
|
|
|
|
+ or "suspend". You can write those words to the file
|
|
|
|
+ to change the device's setting.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ "on" means that the device should be resumed and
|
|
|
|
+ autosuspend is not allowed. (Of course, system
|
|
|
|
+ suspends are still allowed.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ "auto" is the normal state in which the kernel is
|
|
|
|
+ allowed to autosuspend and autoresume the device.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ "suspend" means that the device should remain
|
|
|
|
+ suspended, and autoresume is not allowed. (But remote
|
|
|
|
+ wakeup may still be allowed, since it is controlled
|
|
|
|
+ separately by the power/wakeup attribute.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ power/autosuspend
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ This file contains an integer value, which is the
|
|
|
|
+ number of seconds the device should remain idle before
|
|
|
|
+ the kernel will autosuspend it (the idle-delay time).
|
|
|
|
+ The default is 2. 0 means to autosuspend as soon as
|
|
|
|
+ the device becomes idle, and -1 means never to
|
|
|
|
+ autosuspend. You can write a number to the file to
|
|
|
|
+ change the autosuspend idle-delay time.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Writing "-1" to power/autosuspend and writing "on" to power/level do
|
|
|
|
+essentially the same thing -- they both prevent the device from being
|
|
|
|
+autosuspended. Yes, this is a redundancy in the API.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+(In 2.6.21 writing "0" to power/autosuspend would prevent the device
|
|
|
|
+from being autosuspended; the behavior was changed in 2.6.22. The
|
|
|
|
+power/autosuspend attribute did not exist prior to 2.6.21, and the
|
|
|
|
+power/level attribute did not exist prior to 2.6.22.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Changing the default idle-delay time
|
|
|
|
+ ------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The default autosuspend idle-delay time is controlled by a module
|
|
|
|
+parameter in usbcore. You can specify the value when usbcore is
|
|
|
|
+loaded. For example, to set it to 5 seconds instead of 2 you would
|
|
|
|
+do:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ modprobe usbcore autosuspend=5
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Equivalently, you could add to /etc/modprobe.conf a line saying:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ options usbcore autosuspend=5
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Some distributions load the usbcore module very early during the boot
|
|
|
|
+process, by means of a program or script running from an initramfs
|
|
|
|
+image. To alter the parameter value you would have to rebuild that
|
|
|
|
+image.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+If usbcore is compiled into the kernel rather than built as a loadable
|
|
|
|
+module, you can add
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usbcore.autosuspend=5
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+to the kernel's boot command line.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Finally, the parameter value can be changed while the system is
|
|
|
|
+running. If you do:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ echo 5 >/sys/module/usbcore/parameters/autosuspend
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+then each new USB device will have its autosuspend idle-delay
|
|
|
|
+initialized to 5. (The idle-delay values for already existing devices
|
|
|
|
+will not be affected.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Setting the initial default idle-delay to -1 will prevent any
|
|
|
|
+autosuspend of any USB device. This is a simple alternative to
|
|
|
|
+disabling CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND and rebuilding the kernel, and it has the
|
|
|
|
+added benefit of allowing you to enable autosuspend for selected
|
|
|
|
+devices.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Warnings
|
|
|
|
+ --------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The USB specification states that all USB devices must support power
|
|
|
|
+management. Nevertheless, the sad fact is that many devices do not
|
|
|
|
+support it very well. You can suspend them all right, but when you
|
|
|
|
+try to resume them they disconnect themselves from the USB bus or
|
|
|
|
+they stop working entirely. This seems to be especially prevalent
|
|
|
|
+among printers and scanners, but plenty of other types of device have
|
|
|
|
+the same deficiency.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+For this reason, by default the kernel disables autosuspend (the
|
|
|
|
+power/level attribute is initialized to "on") for all devices other
|
|
|
|
+than hubs. Hubs, at least, appear to be reasonably well-behaved in
|
|
|
|
+this regard.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+(In 2.6.21 and 2.6.22 this wasn't the case. Autosuspend was enabled
|
|
|
|
+by default for almost all USB devices. A number of people experienced
|
|
|
|
+problems as a result.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This means that non-hub devices won't be autosuspended unless the user
|
|
|
|
+or a program explicitly enables it. As of this writing there aren't
|
|
|
|
+any widespread programs which will do this; we hope that in the near
|
|
|
|
+future device managers such as HAL will take on this added
|
|
|
|
+responsibility. In the meantime you can always carry out the
|
|
|
|
+necessary operations by hand or add them to a udev script. You can
|
|
|
|
+also change the idle-delay time; 2 seconds is not the best choice for
|
|
|
|
+every device.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Sometimes it turns out that even when a device does work okay with
|
|
|
|
+autosuspend there are still problems. For example, there are
|
|
|
|
+experimental patches adding autosuspend support to the usbhid driver,
|
|
|
|
+which manages keyboards and mice, among other things. Tests with a
|
|
|
|
+number of keyboards showed that typing on a suspended keyboard, while
|
|
|
|
+causing the keyboard to do a remote wakeup all right, would
|
|
|
|
+nonetheless frequently result in lost keystrokes. Tests with mice
|
|
|
|
+showed that some of them would issue a remote-wakeup request in
|
|
|
|
+response to button presses but not to motion, and some in response to
|
|
|
|
+neither.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The kernel will not prevent you from enabling autosuspend on devices
|
|
|
|
+that can't handle it. It is even possible in theory to damage a
|
|
|
|
+device by suspending it at the wrong time -- for example, suspending a
|
|
|
|
+USB hard disk might cause it to spin down without parking the heads.
|
|
|
|
+(Highly unlikely, but possible.) Take care.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The driver interface for Power Management
|
|
|
|
+ -----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The requirements for a USB driver to support external power management
|
|
|
|
+are pretty modest; the driver need only define
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ .suspend
|
|
|
|
+ .resume
|
|
|
|
+ .reset_resume
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+methods in its usb_driver structure, and the reset_resume method is
|
|
|
|
+optional. The methods' jobs are quite simple:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The suspend method is called to warn the driver that the
|
|
|
|
+ device is going to be suspended. If the driver returns a
|
|
|
|
+ negative error code, the suspend will be aborted. Normally
|
|
|
|
+ the driver will return 0, in which case it must cancel all
|
|
|
|
+ outstanding URBs (usb_kill_urb()) and not submit any more.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The resume method is called to tell the driver that the
|
|
|
|
+ device has been resumed and the driver can return to normal
|
|
|
|
+ operation. URBs may once more be submitted.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The reset_resume method is called to tell the driver that
|
|
|
|
+ the device has been resumed and it also has been reset.
|
|
|
|
+ The driver should redo any necessary device initialization,
|
|
|
|
+ since the device has probably lost most or all of its state
|
|
|
|
+ (although the interfaces will be in the same altsettings as
|
|
|
|
+ before the suspend).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The reset_resume method is used by the USB Persist facility (see
|
|
|
|
+Documentation/usb/persist.txt) and it can also be used under certain
|
|
|
|
+circumstances when CONFIG_USB_PERSIST is not enabled. Currently, if a
|
|
|
|
+device is reset during a resume and the driver does not have a
|
|
|
|
+reset_resume method, the driver won't receive any notification about
|
|
|
|
+the resume. Later kernels will call the driver's disconnect method;
|
|
|
|
+2.6.23 doesn't do this.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+USB drivers are bound to interfaces, so their suspend and resume
|
|
|
|
+methods get called when the interfaces are suspended or resumed. In
|
|
|
|
+principle one might want to suspend some interfaces on a device (i.e.,
|
|
|
|
+force the drivers for those interface to stop all activity) without
|
|
|
|
+suspending the other interfaces. The USB core doesn't allow this; all
|
|
|
|
+interfaces are suspended when the device itself is suspended and all
|
|
|
|
+interfaces are resumed when the device is resumed. It isn't possible
|
|
|
|
+to suspend or resume some but not all of a device's interfaces. The
|
|
|
|
+closest you can come is to unbind the interfaces' drivers.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ The driver interface for autosuspend and autoresume
|
|
|
|
+ ---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+To support autosuspend and autoresume, a driver should implement all
|
|
|
|
+three of the methods listed above. In addition, a driver indicates
|
|
|
|
+that it supports autosuspend by setting the .supports_autosuspend flag
|
|
|
|
+in its usb_driver structure. It is then responsible for informing the
|
|
|
|
+USB core whenever one of its interfaces becomes busy or idle. The
|
|
|
|
+driver does so by calling these three functions:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ int usb_autopm_get_interface(struct usb_interface *intf);
|
|
|
|
+ void usb_autopm_put_interface(struct usb_interface *intf);
|
|
|
|
+ int usb_autopm_set_interface(struct usb_interface *intf);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The functions work by maintaining a counter in the usb_interface
|
|
|
|
+structure. When intf->pm_usage_count is > 0 then the interface is
|
|
|
|
+deemed to be busy, and the kernel will not autosuspend the interface's
|
|
|
|
+device. When intf->pm_usage_count is <= 0 then the interface is
|
|
|
|
+considered to be idle, and the kernel may autosuspend the device.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+(There is a similar pm_usage_count field in struct usb_device,
|
|
|
|
+associated with the device itself rather than any of its interfaces.
|
|
|
|
+This field is used only by the USB core.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The driver owns intf->pm_usage_count; it can modify the value however
|
|
|
|
+and whenever it likes. A nice aspect of the usb_autopm_* routines is
|
|
|
|
+that the changes they make are protected by the usb_device structure's
|
|
|
|
+PM mutex (udev->pm_mutex); however drivers may change pm_usage_count
|
|
|
|
+without holding the mutex.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_get_interface() increments pm_usage_count and
|
|
|
|
+ attempts an autoresume if the new value is > 0 and the
|
|
|
|
+ device is suspended.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_put_interface() decrements pm_usage_count and
|
|
|
|
+ attempts an autosuspend if the new value is <= 0 and the
|
|
|
|
+ device isn't suspended.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_set_interface() leaves pm_usage_count alone.
|
|
|
|
+ It attempts an autoresume if the value is > 0 and the device
|
|
|
|
+ is suspended, and it attempts an autosuspend if the value is
|
|
|
|
+ <= 0 and the device isn't suspended.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+There also are a couple of utility routines drivers can use:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_enable() sets pm_usage_cnt to 1 and then calls
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_set_interface(), which will attempt an autoresume.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_disable() sets pm_usage_cnt to 0 and then calls
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_set_interface(), which will attempt an autosuspend.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The conventional usage pattern is that a driver calls
|
|
|
|
+usb_autopm_get_interface() in its open routine and
|
|
|
|
+usb_autopm_put_interface() in its close or release routine. But
|
|
|
|
+other patterns are possible.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The autosuspend attempts mentioned above will often fail for one
|
|
|
|
+reason or another. For example, the power/level attribute might be
|
|
|
|
+set to "on", or another interface in the same device might not be
|
|
|
|
+idle. This is perfectly normal. If the reason for failure was that
|
|
|
|
+the device hasn't been idle for long enough, a delayed workqueue
|
|
|
|
+routine is automatically set up to carry out the operation when the
|
|
|
|
+autosuspend idle-delay has expired.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Autoresume attempts also can fail. This will happen if power/level is
|
|
|
|
+set to "suspend" or if the device doesn't manage to resume properly.
|
|
|
|
+Unlike autosuspend, there's no delay for an autoresume.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Other parts of the driver interface
|
|
|
|
+ -----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Sometimes a driver needs to make sure that remote wakeup is enabled
|
|
|
|
+during autosuspend. For example, there's not much point
|
|
|
|
+autosuspending a keyboard if the user can't cause the keyboard to do a
|
|
|
|
+remote wakeup by typing on it. If the driver sets
|
|
|
|
+intf->needs_remote_wakeup to 1, the kernel won't autosuspend the
|
|
|
|
+device if remote wakeup isn't available or has been disabled through
|
|
|
|
+the power/wakeup attribute. (If the device is already autosuspended,
|
|
|
|
+though, setting this flag won't cause the kernel to autoresume it.
|
|
|
|
+Normally a driver would set this flag in its probe method, at which
|
|
|
|
+time the device is guaranteed not to be autosuspended.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The usb_autopm_* routines have to run in a sleepable process context;
|
|
|
|
+they must not be called from an interrupt handler or while holding a
|
|
|
|
+spinlock. In fact, the entire autosuspend mechanism is not well geared
|
|
|
|
+toward interrupt-driven operation. However there is one thing a
|
|
|
|
+driver can do in an interrupt handler:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ usb_mark_last_busy(struct usb_device *udev);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This sets udev->last_busy to the current time. udev->last_busy is the
|
|
|
|
+field used for idle-delay calculations; updating it will cause any
|
|
|
|
+pending autosuspend to be moved back. The usb_autopm_* routines will
|
|
|
|
+also set the last_busy field to the current time.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Calling urb_mark_last_busy() from within an URB completion handler is
|
|
|
|
+subject to races: The kernel may have just finished deciding the
|
|
|
|
+device has been idle for long enough but not yet gotten around to
|
|
|
|
+calling the driver's suspend method. The driver would have to be
|
|
|
|
+responsible for synchronizing its suspend method with its URB
|
|
|
|
+completion handler and causing the autosuspend to fail with -EBUSY if
|
|
|
|
+an URB had completed too recently.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+External suspend calls should never be allowed to fail in this way,
|
|
|
|
+only autosuspend calls. The driver can tell them apart by checking
|
|
|
|
+udev->auto_pm; this flag will be set to 1 for internal PM events
|
|
|
|
+(autosuspend or autoresume) and 0 for external PM events.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Many of the ingredients in the autosuspend framework are oriented
|
|
|
|
+towards interfaces: The usb_interface structure contains the
|
|
|
|
+pm_usage_cnt field, and the usb_autopm_* routines take an interface
|
|
|
|
+pointer as their argument. But somewhat confusingly, a few of the
|
|
|
|
+pieces (usb_mark_last_busy() and udev->auto_pm) use the usb_device
|
|
|
|
+structure instead. Drivers need to keep this straight; they can call
|
|
|
|
+interface_to_usbdev() to find the device structure for a given
|
|
|
|
+interface.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Locking requirements
|
|
|
|
+ --------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+All three suspend/resume methods are always called while holding the
|
|
|
|
+usb_device's PM mutex. For external events -- but not necessarily for
|
|
|
|
+autosuspend or autoresume -- the device semaphore (udev->dev.sem) will
|
|
|
|
+also be held. This implies that external suspend/resume events are
|
|
|
|
+mutually exclusive with calls to probe, disconnect, pre_reset, and
|
|
|
|
+post_reset; the USB core guarantees that this is true of internal
|
|
|
|
+suspend/resume events as well.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+If a driver wants to block all suspend/resume calls during some
|
|
|
|
+critical section, it can simply acquire udev->pm_mutex.
|
|
|
|
+Alternatively, if the critical section might call some of the
|
|
|
|
+usb_autopm_* routines, the driver can avoid deadlock by doing:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ down(&udev->dev.sem);
|
|
|
|
+ rc = usb_autopm_get_interface(intf);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+and at the end of the critical section:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ if (!rc)
|
|
|
|
+ usb_autopm_put_interface(intf);
|
|
|
|
+ up(&udev->dev.sem);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Holding the device semaphore will block all external PM calls, and the
|
|
|
|
+usb_autopm_get_interface() will prevent any internal PM calls, even if
|
|
|
|
+it fails. (Exercise: Why?)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The rules for locking order are:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Never acquire any device semaphore while holding any PM mutex.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Never acquire udev->pm_mutex while holding the PM mutex for
|
|
|
|
+ a device that isn't a descendant of udev.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+In other words, PM mutexes should only be acquired going up the device
|
|
|
|
+tree, and they should be acquired only after locking all the device
|
|
|
|
+semaphores you need to hold. These rules don't matter to drivers very
|
|
|
|
+much; they usually affect just the USB core.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Still, drivers do need to be careful. For example, many drivers use a
|
|
|
|
+private mutex to synchronize their normal I/O activities with their
|
|
|
|
+disconnect method. Now if the driver supports autosuspend then it
|
|
|
|
+must call usb_autopm_put_interface() from somewhere -- maybe from its
|
|
|
|
+close method. It should make the call while holding the private mutex,
|
|
|
|
+since a driver shouldn't call any of the usb_autopm_* functions for an
|
|
|
|
+interface from which it has been unbound.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+But the usb_autpm_* routines always acquire the device's PM mutex, and
|
|
|
|
+consequently the locking order has to be: private mutex first, PM
|
|
|
|
+mutex second. Since the suspend method is always called with the PM
|
|
|
|
+mutex held, it mustn't try to acquire the private mutex. It has to
|
|
|
|
+synchronize with the driver's I/O activities in some other way.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ Interaction between dynamic PM and system PM
|
|
|
|
+ --------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Dynamic power management and system power management can interact in
|
|
|
|
+a couple of ways.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Firstly, a device may already be manually suspended or autosuspended
|
|
|
|
+when a system suspend occurs. Since system suspends are supposed to
|
|
|
|
+be as transparent as possible, the device should remain suspended
|
|
|
|
+following the system resume. The 2.6.23 kernel obeys this principle
|
|
|
|
+for manually suspended devices but not for autosuspended devices; they
|
|
|
|
+do get resumed when the system wakes up. (Presumably they will be
|
|
|
|
+autosuspended again after their idle-delay time expires.) In later
|
|
|
|
+kernels this behavior will be fixed.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+(There is an exception. If a device would undergo a reset-resume
|
|
|
|
+instead of a normal resume, and the device is enabled for remote
|
|
|
|
+wakeup, then the reset-resume takes place even if the device was
|
|
|
|
+already suspended when the system suspend began. The justification is
|
|
|
|
+that a reset-resume is a kind of remote-wakeup event. Or to put it
|
|
|
|
+another way, a device which needs a reset won't be able to generate
|
|
|
|
+normal remote-wakeup signals, so it ought to be resumed immediately.)
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Secondly, a dynamic power-management event may occur as a system
|
|
|
|
+suspend is underway. The window for this is short, since system
|
|
|
|
+suspends don't take long (a few seconds usually), but it can happen.
|
|
|
|
+For example, a suspended device may send a remote-wakeup signal while
|
|
|
|
+the system is suspending. The remote wakeup may succeed, which would
|
|
|
|
+cause the system suspend to abort. If the remote wakeup doesn't
|
|
|
|
+succeed, it may still remain active and thus cause the system to
|
|
|
|
+resume as soon as the system suspend is complete. Or the remote
|
|
|
|
+wakeup may fail and get lost. Which outcome occurs depends on timing
|
|
|
|
+and on the hardware and firmware design.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+More interestingly, a device might undergo a manual resume or
|
|
|
|
+autoresume during system suspend. With current kernels this shouldn't
|
|
|
|
+happen, because manual resumes must be initiated by userspace and
|
|
|
|
+autoresumes happen in response to I/O requests, but all user processes
|
|
|
|
+and I/O should be quiescent during a system suspend -- thanks to the
|
|
|
|
+freezer. However there are plans to do away with the freezer, which
|
|
|
|
+would mean these things would become possible. If and when this comes
|
|
|
|
+about, the USB core will carefully arrange matters so that either type
|
|
|
|
+of resume will block until the entire system has resumed.
|