|
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static __le16 ieee80211_duration(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx, int group_addr,
|
|
hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)tx->skb->data;
|
|
hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)tx->skb->data;
|
|
if (ieee80211_is_ctl(hdr->frame_control)) {
|
|
if (ieee80211_is_ctl(hdr->frame_control)) {
|
|
/* TODO: These control frames are not currently sent by
|
|
/* TODO: These control frames are not currently sent by
|
|
- * 80211.o, but should they be implemented, this function
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ * mac80211, but should they be implemented, this function
|
|
* needs to be updated to support duration field calculation.
|
|
* needs to be updated to support duration field calculation.
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* RTS: time needed to transmit pending data/mgmt frame plus
|
|
* RTS: time needed to transmit pending data/mgmt frame plus
|
|
@@ -1580,19 +1580,6 @@ int ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
|
nh_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
|
nh_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
|
h_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
|
h_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* TODO: implement support for fragments so that there is no need to
|
|
|
|
- * reallocate and copy payload; it might be enough to support one
|
|
|
|
- * extra fragment that would be copied in the beginning of the frame
|
|
|
|
- * data.. anyway, it would be nice to include this into skb structure
|
|
|
|
- * somehow
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
- * There are few options for this:
|
|
|
|
- * use skb->cb as an extra space for 802.11 header
|
|
|
|
- * allocate new buffer if not enough headroom
|
|
|
|
- * make sure that there is enough headroom in every skb by increasing
|
|
|
|
- * build in headroom in __dev_alloc_skb() (linux/skbuff.h) and
|
|
|
|
- * alloc_skb() (net/core/skbuff.c)
|
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
|
head_need = hdrlen + encaps_len + meshhdrlen - skb_headroom(skb);
|
|
head_need = hdrlen + encaps_len + meshhdrlen - skb_headroom(skb);
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
/*
|