|
@@ -655,14 +655,29 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, s
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
/*
|
|
* If this dentry is unhashed, then we shouldn't honour this
|
|
* If this dentry is unhashed, then we shouldn't honour this
|
|
- * lookup even if the dentry is positive. Returning ENOENT here
|
|
|
|
- * doesn't do the right thing for all system calls, but it should
|
|
|
|
- * be OK for the operations we permit from an autofs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ * lookup. Returning ENOENT here doesn't do the right thing
|
|
|
|
+ * for all system calls, but it should be OK for the operations
|
|
|
|
+ * we permit from an autofs.
|
|
*/
|
|
*/
|
|
if (dentry->d_inode && d_unhashed(dentry)) {
|
|
if (dentry->d_inode && d_unhashed(dentry)) {
|
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
|
+ * A user space application can (and has done in the past)
|
|
|
|
+ * remove and re-create this directory during the callback.
|
|
|
|
+ * This can leave us with an unhashed dentry, but a
|
|
|
|
+ * successful mount! So we need to perform another
|
|
|
|
+ * cached lookup in case the dentry now exists.
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
|
+ struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
|
|
|
|
+ struct dentry *new = d_lookup(parent, &dentry->d_name);
|
|
|
|
+ if (new != NULL)
|
|
|
|
+ dentry = new;
|
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
|
+ dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
if (unhashed)
|
|
if (unhashed)
|
|
dput(unhashed);
|
|
dput(unhashed);
|
|
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ return dentry;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (unhashed)
|
|
if (unhashed)
|