|
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct nmk_gpio_chip {
|
|
|
/* Keep track of configured edges */
|
|
|
u32 edge_rising;
|
|
|
u32 edge_falling;
|
|
|
+ u32 backup[10];
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void __nmk_gpio_set_mode(struct nmk_gpio_chip *nmk_chip,
|
|
@@ -792,14 +793,60 @@ out:
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
|
|
|
+static int nmk_gpio_pm(struct platform_device *dev, bool suspend)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ struct nmk_gpio_chip *nmk_chip = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
|
|
|
+ int i;
|
|
|
+ static const unsigned int regs[] = {
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_DAT,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_PDIS,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_DIR,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_AFSLA,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_AFSLB,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_SLPC,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_RIMSC,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_FIMSC,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_RWIMSC,
|
|
|
+ NMK_GPIO_FWIMSC,
|
|
|
+ };
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(nmk_chip->backup) != ARRAY_SIZE(regs));
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* XXX: is this sufficient? what about pull-up/down configuration? */
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs); i++) {
|
|
|
+ if (suspend)
|
|
|
+ nmk_chip->backup[i] = readl(nmk_chip->addr + regs[i]);
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
+ writel(nmk_chip->backup[i], nmk_chip->addr + regs[i]);
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+static int nmk_gpio_suspend(struct platform_device *dev, pm_message_t state)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ return nmk_gpio_pm(dev, true);
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+static int nmk_gpio_resume(struct platform_device *dev)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ return nmk_gpio_pm(dev, false);
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+#else
|
|
|
+#define nmk_gpio_suspend NULL
|
|
|
+#define nmk_gpio_resume NULL
|
|
|
+#endif
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
static struct platform_driver nmk_gpio_driver = {
|
|
|
.driver = {
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
|
|
.name = "gpio",
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
.probe = nmk_gpio_probe,
|
|
|
- .suspend = NULL, /* to be done */
|
|
|
- .resume = NULL,
|
|
|
+ .suspend = nmk_gpio_suspend,
|
|
|
+ .resume = nmk_gpio_resume,
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int __init nmk_gpio_init(void)
|