|
@@ -1,59 +1,177 @@
|
|
|
|
+ Real-Time group scheduling
|
|
|
|
+ --------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
+========
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Real-Time group scheduling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+1. Overview
|
|
|
|
+ 1.1 The problem
|
|
|
|
+ 1.2 The solution
|
|
|
|
+2. The interface
|
|
|
|
+ 2.1 System-wide settings
|
|
|
|
+ 2.2 Default behaviour
|
|
|
|
+ 2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
|
|
|
|
+3. Future plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The problem space:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-In order to schedule multiple groups of realtime tasks each group must
|
|
|
|
-be assigned a fixed portion of the CPU time available. Without a minimum
|
|
|
|
-guarantee a realtime group can obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit
|
|
|
|
-is of no use since it cannot be relied upon. Which leaves us with just
|
|
|
|
-the single fixed portion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+1. Overview
|
|
|
|
+===========
|
|
|
|
|
|
-CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent
|
|
|
|
-running in a given period. Say a frame fixed realtime renderer must
|
|
|
|
-deliver 25 frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s. Now say
|
|
|
|
-it will also have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it
|
|
|
|
-with around 80% for the graphics. We can then give this group a runtime
|
|
|
|
-of 0.8 * 0.04s = 0.032s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s runtime
|
|
|
|
-limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+1.1 The problem
|
|
|
|
+---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
|
|
|
|
-needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s
|
|
|
|
-= 0.00015s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+Realtime scheduling is all about determinism, a group has to be able to rely on
|
|
|
|
+the amount of bandwidth (eg. CPU time) being constant. In order to schedule
|
|
|
|
+multiple groups of realtime tasks, each group must be assigned a fixed portion
|
|
|
|
+of the CPU time available. Without a minimum guarantee a realtime group can
|
|
|
|
+obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit is of no use since it cannot be
|
|
|
|
+relied upon. Which leaves us with just the single fixed portion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+1.2 The solution
|
|
|
|
+----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The Interface:
|
|
|
|
|
|
+CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent running
|
|
|
|
+in a given period. We allocate this "run time" for each realtime group which
|
|
|
|
+the other realtime groups will not be permitted to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-system wide:
|
|
|
|
|
|
+Any time not allocated to a realtime group will be used to run normal priority
|
|
|
|
+tasks (SCHED_OTHER). Any allocated run time not used will also be picked up by
|
|
|
|
+SCHED_OTHER.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_ms
|
|
|
|
-/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
|
|
|
|
|
|
+Let's consider an example: a frame fixed realtime renderer must deliver 25
|
|
|
|
+frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s per frame. Now say it will also
|
|
|
|
+have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it with around 80% CPU
|
|
|
|
+time dedicated for the graphics. We can then give this group a run time of 0.8
|
|
|
|
+* 0.04s = 0.032s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED
|
|
|
|
|
|
+This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s run time
|
|
|
|
+limit. Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
|
|
|
|
+needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s =
|
|
|
|
+0.00015s. So this group can be scheduled with a period of 0.005s and a run time
|
|
|
|
+of 0.00015s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_runtime_us
|
|
|
|
|
|
+The remaining CPU time will be used for user input and other tass. Because
|
|
|
|
+realtime tasks have explicitly allocated the CPU time they need to perform
|
|
|
|
+their tasks, buffer underruns in the graphocs or audio can be eliminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-or
|
|
|
|
|
|
+NOTE: the above example is not fully implemented as of yet (2.6.25). We still
|
|
|
|
+lack an EDF scheduler to make non-uniform periods usable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us
|
|
|
|
|
|
+2. The Interface
|
|
|
|
+================
|
|
|
|
|
|
-[ time is specified in us because the interface is s32; this gives an
|
|
|
|
- operating range of ~35m to 1us ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The period takes values in [ 1, INT_MAX ], runtime in [ -1, INT_MAX - 1 ].
|
|
|
|
|
|
+2.1 System wide settings
|
|
|
|
+------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-A runtime of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-New groups get the period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and
|
|
|
|
-a runtime of 0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us:
|
|
|
|
+ The scheduling period that is equivalent to 100% CPU bandwidth
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Settings are constrained to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
+/proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us:
|
|
|
|
+ A global limit on how much time realtime scheduling may use. Even without
|
|
|
|
+ CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled, this will limit time reserved to realtime
|
|
|
|
+ processes. With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED it signifies the total bandwidth
|
|
|
|
+ available to all realtime groups.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ * Time is specified in us because the interface is s32. This gives an
|
|
|
|
+ operating range from 1us to about 35 minutes.
|
|
|
|
+ * sched_rt_period_us takes values from 1 to INT_MAX.
|
|
|
|
+ * sched_rt_runtime_us takes values from -1 to (INT_MAX - 1).
|
|
|
|
+ * A run time of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+2.2 Default behaviour
|
|
|
|
+---------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The default values for sched_rt_period_us (1000000 or 1s) and
|
|
|
|
+sched_rt_runtime_us (950000 or 0.95s). This gives 0.05s to be used by
|
|
|
|
+SCHED_OTHER (non-RT tasks). These defaults were chosen so that a run-away
|
|
|
|
+realtime tasks will not lock up the machine but leave a little time to recover
|
|
|
|
+it. By setting runtime to -1 you'd get the old behaviour back.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+By default all bandwidth is assigned to the root group and new groups get the
|
|
|
|
+period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and a run time of 0. If you
|
|
|
|
+want to assign bandwidth to another group, reduce the root group's bandwidth
|
|
|
|
+and assign some or all of the difference to another group.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Realtime group scheduling means you have to assign a portion of total CPU
|
|
|
|
+bandwidth to the group before it will accept realtime tasks. Therefore you will
|
|
|
|
+not be able to run realtime tasks as any user other than root until you have
|
|
|
|
+done that, even if the user has the rights to run processes with realtime
|
|
|
|
+priority!
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
|
|
|
|
+----------------------------
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+There are two compile-time settings for allocating CPU bandwidth. These are
|
|
|
|
+configured using the "Basis for grouping tasks" multiple choice menu under
|
|
|
|
+General setup > Group CPU Scheduler:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+a. CONFIG_USER_SCHED (aka "Basis for grouping tasks" = "user id")
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This lets you use the virtual files under
|
|
|
|
+"/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_runtime_us" to control he CPU time reserved for
|
|
|
|
+each user .
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The other option is:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+.o CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED (aka "Basis for grouping tasks" = "Control groups")
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This uses the /cgroup virtual file system and "/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us"
|
|
|
|
+to control the CPU time reserved for each control group instead.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+For more information on working with control groups, you should read
|
|
|
|
+Documentation/cgroups.txt as well.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Group settings are checked against the following limits in order to keep the configuration
|
|
|
|
+schedulable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
\Sum_{i} runtime_{i} / global_period <= global_runtime / global_period
|
|
\Sum_{i} runtime_{i} / global_period <= global_runtime / global_period
|
|
|
|
|
|
-in order to keep the configuration schedulable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+For now, this can be simplified to just the following (but see Future plans):
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ \Sum_{i} runtime_{i} <= global_runtime
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+3. Future plans
|
|
|
|
+===============
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+There is work in progress to make the scheduling period for each group
|
|
|
|
+("/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_rt_period_us" or
|
|
|
|
+"/cgroup/<cgroup>/cpu.rt_period_us" respectively) configurable as well.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The constraint on the period is that a subgroup must have a smaller or
|
|
|
|
+equal period to its parent. But realistically its not very useful _yet_
|
|
|
|
+as its prone to starvation without deadline scheduling.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Consider two sibling groups A and B; both have 50% bandwidth, but A's
|
|
|
|
+period is twice the length of B's.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+* group A: period=100000us, runtime=10000us
|
|
|
|
+ - this runs for 0.01s once every 0.1s
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+* group B: period= 50000us, runtime=10000us
|
|
|
|
+ - this runs for 0.01s twice every 0.1s (or once every 0.05 sec).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This means that currently a while (1) loop in A will run for the full period of
|
|
|
|
+B and can starve B's tasks (assuming they are of lower priority) for a whole
|
|
|
|
+period.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The next project will be SCHED_EDF (Earliest Deadline First scheduling) to bring
|
|
|
|
+full deadline scheduling to the linux kernel. Deadline scheduling the above
|
|
|
|
+groups and treating end of the period as a deadline will ensure that they both
|
|
|
|
+get their allocated time.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
|
|
|
|
+the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
|
|
|
|
+the limited static priority levels 0-139. With deadline scheduling you need to
|
|
|
|
+do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
|
|
|
|
+deadline delta (deadline - now).
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+This means the whole PI machinery will have to be reworked - and that is one of
|
|
|
|
+the most complex pieces of code we have.
|