Browse Source

cifs: small variable name cleanup

server and ses->server are the same, but it's a little bit ugly that we
lock &ses->server->srv_mutex and unlock &server->srv_mutex.  It causes
a false positive in Smatch about inconsistent locking.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Dan Carpenter 12 years ago
parent
commit
b13ce4bbca
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 1 1
      fs/cifs/connect.c

+ 1 - 1
fs/cifs/connect.c

@@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ cifs_setup_session(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
 	if (rc) {
 	if (rc) {
 		cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
 		cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
 	} else {
 	} else {
-		mutex_lock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
+		mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
 		if (!server->session_estab) {
 		if (!server->session_estab) {
 			server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
 			server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
 			server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;
 			server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;