فهرست منبع

x86: unify the implementation of FPU traps

On 32 bits, we may suffer IRQ 13, or supposedly we might have a buggy
implementation which gives spurious trap 16.  We did not check for
this on 64 bits, but there is no reason we can't make the code the
same in both cases.  Furthermore, this is presumably rare, so do the
spurious check last, instead of first.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin 16 سال پیش
والد
کامیت
a73ad3331f
1فایلهای تغییر یافته به همراه4 افزوده شده و 7 حذف شده
  1. 4 7
      arch/x86/kernel/traps.c

+ 4 - 7
arch/x86/kernel/traps.c

@@ -689,12 +689,7 @@ void math_error(void __user *ip)
 	cwd = get_fpu_cwd(task);
 	cwd = get_fpu_cwd(task);
 	swd = get_fpu_swd(task);
 	swd = get_fpu_swd(task);
 
 
-	err = swd & ~cwd & 0x3f;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-	if (!err)
-		return;
-#endif
+	err = swd & ~cwd;
 
 
 	if (err & 0x001) {	/* Invalid op */
 	if (err & 0x001) {	/* Invalid op */
 		/*
 		/*
@@ -712,7 +707,9 @@ void math_error(void __user *ip)
 	} else if (err & 0x020) { /* Precision */
 	} else if (err & 0x020) { /* Precision */
 		info.si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
 		info.si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
 	} else {
 	} else {
-		info.si_code = __SI_FAULT|SI_KERNEL; /* WTF? */
+		/* If we're using IRQ 13, or supposedly even some trap 16
+		   implementations, it's possible we get a spurious trap... */
+		return;		/* Spurious trap, no error */
 	}
 	}
 	force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, task);
 	force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, task);
 }
 }