security/ima: replace gcc specific __FUNCTION__ with __func__

As noted by checkpatch.pl, __func__ should be used instead of gcc
specific __FUNCTION__.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c

@@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ void iint_free(struct kref *kref)
 	iint->version = 0;
 	iint->flags = 0UL;
 	if (iint->readcount != 0) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: readcount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: readcount: %ld\n", __func__,
 		       iint->readcount);
 		iint->readcount = 0;
 	}
 	if (iint->writecount != 0) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: writecount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: writecount: %ld\n", __func__,
 		       iint->writecount);
 		iint->writecount = 0;
 	}
 	if (iint->opencount != 0) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: opencount: %ld\n", __FUNCTION__,
+		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: opencount: %ld\n", __func__,
 		       iint->opencount);
 		iint->opencount = 0;
 	}

security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void ima_dec_counts(struct ima_iint_cache *iint, struct inode *inode,
 	     (iint->writecount < 0)) &&
 	    !ima_limit_imbalance(file)) {
 		printk(KERN_INFO "%s: open/free imbalance (r:%ld w:%ld o:%ld)\n",
-		       __FUNCTION__, iint->readcount, iint->writecount,
+		       __func__, iint->readcount, iint->writecount,
 		       iint->opencount);
 		dump_stack();
 	}