[PATCH] RTCs don't use i2c_adapter.dev

Update more I2C drivers that live outside drivers/i2c to understand that using
adapter->dev is not The Way.  When actually referring to the adapter hardware,
adapter->class_dev.dev is the answer.  When referring to a device connected to
it, client->dev.dev is the answer.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1672.c

@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int ds1672_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
 	struct i2c_client *client;
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
-	dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+	dev_dbg(adapter->class_dev.dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
 		err = -ENODEV;

drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int pcf8563_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 		xfer = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs));
 
 		if (xfer != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)) {
-			dev_err(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_err(&client->dev,
 				"%s: could not read register 0x%02X\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, pattern[i].reg);
 
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int pcf8563_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 		if (value > pattern[i].max ||
 			value < pattern[i].min) {
-			dev_dbg(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_dbg(&client->dev,
 				"%s: pattern=%d, reg=%x, mask=0x%02x, min=%d, "
 				"max=%d, value=%d, raw=0x%02X\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, i, pattern[i].reg, pattern[i].mask,
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int pcf8563_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
 
 	int err = 0;
 
-	dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+	dev_dbg(adapter->class_dev.dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
 		err = -ENODEV;

drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c

@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
 	struct i2c_client *client;
 	struct rs5c372 *rs5c372;
 
-	dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+	dev_dbg(adapter->class_dev.dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
 		err = -ENODEV;

drivers/rtc/rtc-x1205.c

@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int x1205_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 		};
 
 		if ((xfer = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, 2)) != 2) {
-			dev_err(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_err(&client->dev,
 				"%s: could not read register %x\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, probe_zero_pattern[i]);
 
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int x1205_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 		}
 
 		if ((buf & probe_zero_pattern[i+1]) != 0) {
-			dev_err(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_err(&client->dev,
 				"%s: register=%02x, zero pattern=%d, value=%x\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, probe_zero_pattern[i], i, buf);
 
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int x1205_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 		};
 
 		if ((xfer = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, 2)) != 2) {
-			dev_err(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_err(&client->dev,
 				"%s: could not read register %x\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, probe_limits_pattern[i].reg);
 
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static int x1205_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 		if (value > probe_limits_pattern[i].max ||
 			value < probe_limits_pattern[i].min) {
-			dev_dbg(&client->adapter->dev,
+			dev_dbg(&client->dev,
 				"%s: register=%x, lim pattern=%d, value=%d\n",
 				__FUNCTION__, probe_limits_pattern[i].reg,
 				i, value);
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ static int x1205_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
 	struct i2c_client *client;
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
-	dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+	dev_dbg(adapter->class_dev.dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
 	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
 		err = -ENODEV;