Support for lilly-1131 modules and baseboards [v2]

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:42:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>,
> > > 	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
> >
> > ... which causes my mutt to only reply to the list.
>
> Ah, ok. /me hacking in muttrc... Does it work now?

Yep :)

> >  	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device0, &uart_pdata);
> > +	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device1, &uart_pdata);
> > +	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device2, &uart_pdata);
>
> What about the RXD3/TXD3 pins?

You're right - I got the IOMUX tables wrong and thought UART0 pins are
selected unconditionally. But as it turns out TXD1/RXD1 is for UART0
(mxc_uart_device0), TXD2/RXD2 for UART1 (mxc_uart_device1) etc.

Below is a new patch.

Thanks,
Daniel

From e7eb5fa0fed09d667a4b2f168fe466e2cc645abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:22:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: MX3: add two more UARTs to lilly-1131-db

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

arch/arm/mach-mx3/mx31lilly-db.c

@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ static unsigned int lilly_db_board_pins[] __initdata = {
 	MX31_PIN_RTS1__RTS1,
 	MX31_PIN_TXD1__TXD1,
 	MX31_PIN_RXD1__RXD1,
+	MX31_PIN_CTS2__CTS2,
+	MX31_PIN_RTS2__RTS2,
+	MX31_PIN_TXD2__TXD2,
+	MX31_PIN_RXD2__RXD2,
+	MX31_PIN_CSPI3_MOSI__RXD3,
+	MX31_PIN_CSPI3_MISO__TXD3,
+	MX31_PIN_CSPI3_SCLK__RTS3,
+	MX31_PIN_CSPI3_SPI_RDY__CTS3,
 	MX31_PIN_SD1_DATA3__SD1_DATA3,
 	MX31_PIN_SD1_DATA2__SD1_DATA2,
 	MX31_PIN_SD1_DATA1__SD1_DATA1,
@@ -200,6 +208,8 @@ void __init mx31lilly_db_init(void)
 					ARRAY_SIZE(lilly_db_board_pins),
 					"development board pins");
 	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device0, &uart_pdata);
+	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device1, &uart_pdata);
+	mxc_register_device(&mxc_uart_device2, &uart_pdata);
 	mxc_register_device(&mxcsdhc_device0, &mmc_pdata);
 	mx31lilly_init_fb();
 }