|
@@ -2588,28 +2588,20 @@ handle_msg_timeout(struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg)
|
|
|
deliver_response(msg);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-static void
|
|
|
-send_from_recv_msg(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *recv_msg,
|
|
|
- struct ipmi_smi_msg *smi_msg,
|
|
|
- unsigned char seq, long seqid)
|
|
|
+static struct ipmi_smi_msg *
|
|
|
+smi_from_recv_msg(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *recv_msg,
|
|
|
+ unsigned char seq, long seqid)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
- if (!smi_msg)
|
|
|
- smi_msg = ipmi_alloc_smi_msg();
|
|
|
+ struct ipmi_smi_msg *smi_msg = ipmi_alloc_smi_msg();
|
|
|
if (!smi_msg)
|
|
|
/* If we can't allocate the message, then just return, we
|
|
|
get 4 retries, so this should be ok. */
|
|
|
- return;
|
|
|
+ return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(smi_msg->data, recv_msg->msg.data, recv_msg->msg.data_len);
|
|
|
smi_msg->data_size = recv_msg->msg.data_len;
|
|
|
smi_msg->msgid = STORE_SEQ_IN_MSGID(seq, seqid);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* Send the new message. We send with a zero priority. It
|
|
|
- timed out, I doubt time is that critical now, and high
|
|
|
- priority messages are really only for messages to the local
|
|
|
- MC, which don't get resent. */
|
|
|
- intf->handlers->sender(intf->send_info, smi_msg, 0);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
#ifdef DEBUG_MSGING
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
int m;
|
|
@@ -2619,6 +2611,7 @@ send_from_recv_msg(ipmi_smi_t intf, struct ipmi_recv_msg *recv_msg,
|
|
|
printk("\n");
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
+ return smi_msg;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
@@ -2683,14 +2676,13 @@ ipmi_timeout_handler(long timeout_period)
|
|
|
intf->timed_out_ipmb_commands++;
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&intf->counter_lock);
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
+ struct ipmi_smi_msg *smi_msg;
|
|
|
/* More retries, send again. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Start with the max timer, set to normal
|
|
|
timer after the message is sent. */
|
|
|
ent->timeout = MAX_MSG_TIMEOUT;
|
|
|
ent->retries_left--;
|
|
|
- send_from_recv_msg(intf, ent->recv_msg, NULL,
|
|
|
- j, ent->seqid);
|
|
|
spin_lock(&intf->counter_lock);
|
|
|
if (ent->recv_msg->addr.addr_type
|
|
|
== IPMI_LAN_ADDR_TYPE)
|
|
@@ -2698,6 +2690,20 @@ ipmi_timeout_handler(long timeout_period)
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
intf->retransmitted_ipmb_commands++;
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&intf->counter_lock);
|
|
|
+ smi_msg = smi_from_recv_msg(intf,
|
|
|
+ ent->recv_msg, j, ent->seqid);
|
|
|
+ if(!smi_msg)
|
|
|
+ continue;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(intf->seq_lock),flags);
|
|
|
+ /* Send the new message. We send with a zero
|
|
|
+ * priority. It timed out, I doubt time is
|
|
|
+ * that critical now, and high priority
|
|
|
+ * messages are really only for messages to the
|
|
|
+ * local MC, which don't get resent. */
|
|
|
+ intf->handlers->sender(intf->send_info,
|
|
|
+ smi_msg, 0);
|
|
|
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&(intf->seq_lock), flags);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&(intf->seq_lock), flags);
|