|
@@ -577,23 +577,15 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
case SO_SNDBUF:
|
|
case SO_SNDBUF:
|
|
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
|
|
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
|
|
- about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
|
|
|
|
- play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
|
|
|
|
- are treated in BSD as hints */
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- if (val > sysctl_wmem_max)
|
|
|
|
- val = sysctl_wmem_max;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ * about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
|
|
|
|
+ * play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
|
|
|
|
+ * are treated in BSD as hints
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
|
+ val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max);
|
|
set_sndbuf:
|
|
set_sndbuf:
|
|
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
|
|
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
|
|
- if ((val * 2) < SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF)
|
|
|
|
- sk->sk_sndbuf = SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF;
|
|
|
|
- else
|
|
|
|
- sk->sk_sndbuf = val * 2;
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
|
- * Wake up sending tasks if we
|
|
|
|
- * upped the value.
|
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
|
|
|
|
+ /* Wake up sending tasks if we upped the value. */
|
|
sk->sk_write_space(sk);
|
|
sk->sk_write_space(sk);
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -606,12 +598,11 @@ set_sndbuf:
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_RCVBUF:
|
|
case SO_RCVBUF:
|
|
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
|
|
/* Don't error on this BSD doesn't and if you think
|
|
- about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
|
|
|
|
- play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
|
|
|
|
- are treated in BSD as hints */
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- if (val > sysctl_rmem_max)
|
|
|
|
- val = sysctl_rmem_max;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ * about it this is right. Otherwise apps have to
|
|
|
|
+ * play 'guess the biggest size' games. RCVBUF/SNDBUF
|
|
|
|
+ * are treated in BSD as hints
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
|
+ val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_rmem_max);
|
|
set_rcvbuf:
|
|
set_rcvbuf:
|
|
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
|
|
sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
|
|
/*
|
|
/*
|
|
@@ -629,10 +620,7 @@ set_rcvbuf:
|
|
* returning the value we actually used in getsockopt
|
|
* returning the value we actually used in getsockopt
|
|
* is the most desirable behavior.
|
|
* is the most desirable behavior.
|
|
*/
|
|
*/
|
|
- if ((val * 2) < SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF)
|
|
|
|
- sk->sk_rcvbuf = SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF;
|
|
|
|
- else
|
|
|
|
- sk->sk_rcvbuf = val * 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(u32, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_RCVBUFFORCE:
|
|
case SO_RCVBUFFORCE:
|
|
@@ -975,7 +963,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_PASSCRED:
|
|
case SO_PASSCRED:
|
|
- v.val = test_bit(SOCK_PASSCRED, &sock->flags) ? 1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ v.val = !!test_bit(SOCK_PASSCRED, &sock->flags);
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_PEERCRED:
|
|
case SO_PEERCRED:
|
|
@@ -1010,7 +998,7 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_PASSSEC:
|
|
case SO_PASSSEC:
|
|
- v.val = test_bit(SOCK_PASSSEC, &sock->flags) ? 1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ v.val = !!test_bit(SOCK_PASSSEC, &sock->flags);
|
|
break;
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
case SO_PEERSEC:
|
|
case SO_PEERSEC:
|