|
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|
|
|
+Rationale
|
|
|
|
+=========
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+How significant is the cache maintenance overhead?
|
|
|
|
+It depends. Fast eMMC and multiple cache levels with speculative cache
|
|
|
|
+pre-fetch makes the cache overhead relatively significant. If the DMA
|
|
|
|
+preparations for the next request are done in parallel with the current
|
|
|
|
+transfer, the DMA preparation overhead would not affect the MMC performance.
|
|
|
|
+The intention of non-blocking (asynchronous) MMC requests is to minimize the
|
|
|
|
+time between when an MMC request ends and another MMC request begins.
|
|
|
|
+Using mmc_wait_for_req(), the MMC controller is idle while dma_map_sg and
|
|
|
|
+dma_unmap_sg are processing. Using non-blocking MMC requests makes it
|
|
|
|
+possible to prepare the caches for next job in parallel with an active
|
|
|
|
+MMC request.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+MMC block driver
|
|
|
|
+================
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() in the MMC block driver is made non-blocking.
|
|
|
|
+The increase in throughput is proportional to the time it takes to
|
|
|
|
+prepare (major part of preparations are dma_map_sg() and dma_unmap_sg())
|
|
|
|
+a request and how fast the memory is. The faster the MMC/SD is the
|
|
|
|
+more significant the prepare request time becomes. Roughly the expected
|
|
|
|
+performance gain is 5% for large writes and 10% on large reads on a L2 cache
|
|
|
|
+platform. In power save mode, when clocks run on a lower frequency, the DMA
|
|
|
|
+preparation may cost even more. As long as these slower preparations are run
|
|
|
|
+in parallel with the transfer performance won't be affected.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Details on measurements from IOZone and mmc_test
|
|
|
|
+================================================
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Specs/StoragePerfMMC-async-req
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+MMC core API extension
|
|
|
|
+======================
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+There is one new public function mmc_start_req().
|
|
|
|
+It starts a new MMC command request for a host. The function isn't
|
|
|
|
+truly non-blocking. If there is an ongoing async request it waits
|
|
|
|
+for completion of that request and starts the new one and returns. It
|
|
|
|
+doesn't wait for the new request to complete. If there is no ongoing
|
|
|
|
+request it starts the new request and returns immediately.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+MMC host extensions
|
|
|
|
+===================
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+There are two optional members in the mmc_host_ops -- pre_req() and
|
|
|
|
+post_req() -- that the host driver may implement in order to move work
|
|
|
|
+to before and after the actual mmc_host_ops.request() function is called.
|
|
|
|
+In the DMA case pre_req() may do dma_map_sg() and prepare the DMA
|
|
|
|
+descriptor, and post_req() runs the dma_unmap_sg().
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Optimize for the first request
|
|
|
|
+==============================
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+The first request in a series of requests can't be prepared in parallel
|
|
|
|
+with the previous transfer, since there is no previous request.
|
|
|
|
+The argument is_first_req in pre_req() indicates that there is no previous
|
|
|
|
+request. The host driver may optimize for this scenario to minimize
|
|
|
|
+the performance loss. A way to optimize for this is to split the current
|
|
|
|
+request in two chunks, prepare the first chunk and start the request,
|
|
|
|
+and finally prepare the second chunk and start the transfer.
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+Pseudocode to handle is_first_req scenario with minimal prepare overhead:
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+if (is_first_req && req->size > threshold)
|
|
|
|
+ /* start MMC transfer for the complete transfer size */
|
|
|
|
+ mmc_start_command(MMC_CMD_TRANSFER_FULL_SIZE);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
|
+ * Begin to prepare DMA while cmd is being processed by MMC.
|
|
|
|
+ * The first chunk of the request should take the same time
|
|
|
|
+ * to prepare as the "MMC process command time".
|
|
|
|
+ * If prepare time exceeds MMC cmd time
|
|
|
|
+ * the transfer is delayed, guesstimate max 4k as first chunk size.
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
|
+ prepare_1st_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
|
|
|
+ /* flush pending desc to the DMAC (dmaengine.h) */
|
|
|
|
+ dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ prepare_2nd_chunk_for_dma(req);
|
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
|
+ * The second issue_pending should be called before MMC runs out
|
|
|
|
+ * of the first chunk. If the MMC runs out of the first data chunk
|
|
|
|
+ * before this call, the transfer is delayed.
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
|
+ dma_issue_pending(req->dma_desc);
|