|
@@ -628,26 +628,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
|
tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
|
|
tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
|
- * Disable the reorder release timer for now.
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
- * The current implementation lacks a proper locking scheme
|
|
|
|
- * which would protect vital statistic and debug counters
|
|
|
|
- * from being updated by two different but concurrent BHs.
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
- * More information about the topic is available from:
|
|
|
|
- * - thread: http://marc.info/?t=128635927000001
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
- * What was wrong:
|
|
|
|
- * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128636170811964
|
|
|
|
- * "Basically the thing is that until your patch, the data
|
|
|
|
- * in the struct didn't actually need locking because it
|
|
|
|
- * was accessed by the RX path only which is not concurrent."
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
- * List of what needs to be fixed:
|
|
|
|
- * => http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128656352920957
|
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
if (tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num) {
|
|
if (tid_agg_rx->stored_mpdu_num) {
|
|
j = index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num,
|
|
j = index = seq_sub(tid_agg_rx->head_seq_num,
|
|
tid_agg_rx->ssn) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
|
|
tid_agg_rx->ssn) % tid_agg_rx->buf_size;
|
|
@@ -666,10 +646,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_reorder_release(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
|
|
} else {
|
|
} else {
|
|
del_timer(&tid_agg_rx->reorder_timer);
|
|
del_timer(&tid_agg_rx->reorder_timer);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
- */
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-set_release_timer:
|
|
|
|
- return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
/*
|