|
@@ -411,26 +411,6 @@ do_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
|
|
|
return dentry;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/*
|
|
|
- * Internal lookup() using the new generic dcache.
|
|
|
- * SMP-safe
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
-static struct dentry * cached_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
|
|
|
-{
|
|
|
- struct dentry * dentry = __d_lookup(parent, name);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
|
|
|
- * in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- if (!dentry)
|
|
|
- dentry = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
|
|
|
- dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- return dentry;
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
* Short-cut version of permission(), for calling by
|
|
|
* path_walk(), when dcache lock is held. Combines parts
|
|
@@ -463,70 +443,6 @@ ok:
|
|
|
return security_inode_permission(inode, MAY_EXEC);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/*
|
|
|
- * This is called when everything else fails, and we actually have
|
|
|
- * to go to the low-level filesystem to find out what we should do..
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * We get the directory semaphore, and after getting that we also
|
|
|
- * make sure that nobody added the entry to the dcache in the meantime..
|
|
|
- * SMP-safe
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
-static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
|
|
|
-{
|
|
|
- struct dentry * result;
|
|
|
- struct inode *dir = parent->d_inode;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
|
|
|
- * while we waited for the directory semaphore..
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
|
|
|
- * avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
|
|
|
- * from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
|
|
|
- * negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
|
|
|
- * fast walk).
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- result = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
|
|
- if (!result) {
|
|
|
- struct dentry *dentry;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
|
|
|
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
- if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
|
|
|
- goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
|
|
|
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
|
|
- if (dentry) {
|
|
|
- result = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
|
|
|
- if (result)
|
|
|
- dput(dentry);
|
|
|
- else
|
|
|
- result = dentry;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-out_unlock:
|
|
|
- mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
- return result;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
|
|
|
- * we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
- if (result->d_op && result->d_op->d_revalidate) {
|
|
|
- result = do_revalidate(result, nd);
|
|
|
- if (!result)
|
|
|
- result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
- return result;
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
static __always_inline void set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
if (!nd->root.mnt) {
|
|
@@ -767,7 +683,8 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
|
|
|
struct path *path)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
struct vfsmount *mnt = nd->path.mnt;
|
|
|
- struct dentry *dentry;
|
|
|
+ struct dentry *dentry, *parent;
|
|
|
+ struct inode *dir;
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
* See if the low-level filesystem might want
|
|
|
* to use its own hash..
|
|
@@ -790,7 +707,59 @@ done:
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
need_lookup:
|
|
|
- dentry = real_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name, nd);
|
|
|
+ parent = nd->path.dentry;
|
|
|
+ dir = parent->d_inode;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
|
|
|
+ * while we waited for the directory semaphore..
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
|
|
|
+ * avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
|
|
|
+ * from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
|
|
|
+ * negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
|
|
|
+ * fast walk).
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ dentry = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
|
|
+ if (!dentry) {
|
|
|
+ struct dentry *new;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
|
|
|
+ dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
+ if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
|
|
|
+ goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ new = d_alloc(parent, name);
|
|
|
+ dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
|
|
+ if (new) {
|
|
|
+ dentry = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, new, nd);
|
|
|
+ if (dentry)
|
|
|
+ dput(new);
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
+ dentry = new;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+out_unlock:
|
|
|
+ mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
+ if (IS_ERR(dentry))
|
|
|
+ goto fail;
|
|
|
+ goto done;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
|
|
|
+ * we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
|
|
+ if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) {
|
|
|
+ dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
|
|
+ if (!dentry)
|
|
|
+ dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
|
|
|
goto fail;
|
|
|
goto done;
|
|
@@ -1144,7 +1113,17 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name,
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- dentry = cached_lookup(base, name, nd);
|
|
|
+ dentry = __d_lookup(base, name);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
|
|
|
+ * in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (!dentry)
|
|
|
+ dentry = d_lookup(base, name);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
|
|
|
+ dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
if (!dentry) {
|
|
|
struct dentry *new;
|
|
|
|