|
@@ -97,6 +97,34 @@ static inline void list_del_rcu(struct list_head *entry)
|
|
|
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+/**
|
|
|
+ * hlist_del_init_rcu - deletes entry from hash list with re-initialization
|
|
|
+ * @n: the element to delete from the hash list.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * Note: list_unhashed() on the node return true after this. It is
|
|
|
+ * useful for RCU based read lockfree traversal if the writer side
|
|
|
+ * must know if the list entry is still hashed or already unhashed.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * In particular, it means that we can not poison the forward pointers
|
|
|
+ * that may still be used for walking the hash list and we can only
|
|
|
+ * zero the pprev pointer so list_unhashed() will return true after
|
|
|
+ * this.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * The caller must take whatever precautions are necessary (such as
|
|
|
+ * holding appropriate locks) to avoid racing with another
|
|
|
+ * list-mutation primitive, such as hlist_add_head_rcu() or
|
|
|
+ * hlist_del_rcu(), running on this same list. However, it is
|
|
|
+ * perfectly legal to run concurrently with the _rcu list-traversal
|
|
|
+ * primitives, such as hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+static inline void hlist_del_init_rcu(struct hlist_node *n)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(n)) {
|
|
|
+ __hlist_del(n);
|
|
|
+ n->pprev = NULL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
* list_replace_rcu - replace old entry by new one
|
|
|
* @old : the element to be replaced
|