浏览代码

net: Fix wrong interpretation of some copy_to_user() results.

I found some places, that erroneously return the value obtained from
the copy_to_user() call: if some amount of bytes were not able to get
to the user (this is what this one returns) the proper behavior is to
return the -EFAULT error, not that number itself.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Pavel Emelyanov 17 年之前
父节点
当前提交
653252c230
共有 3 个文件被更改,包括 5 次插入4 次删除
  1. 2 1
      net/can/raw.c
  2. 1 1
      net/dccp/probe.c
  3. 2 2
      net/tipc/socket.c

+ 2 - 1
net/can/raw.c

@@ -573,7 +573,8 @@ static int raw_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
 			int fsize = ro->count * sizeof(struct can_filter);
 			int fsize = ro->count * sizeof(struct can_filter);
 			if (len > fsize)
 			if (len > fsize)
 				len = fsize;
 				len = fsize;
-			err = copy_to_user(optval, ro->filter, len);
+			if (copy_to_user(optval, ro->filter, len))
+				err = -EFAULT;
 		} else
 		} else
 			len = 0;
 			len = 0;
 		release_sock(sk);
 		release_sock(sk);

+ 1 - 1
net/dccp/probe.c

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static ssize_t dccpprobe_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
 		goto out_free;
 		goto out_free;
 
 
 	cnt = kfifo_get(dccpw.fifo, tbuf, len);
 	cnt = kfifo_get(dccpw.fifo, tbuf, len);
-	error = copy_to_user(buf, tbuf, cnt);
+	error = copy_to_user(buf, tbuf, cnt) ? -EFAULT : 0;
 
 
 out_free:
 out_free:
 	vfree(tbuf);
 	vfree(tbuf);

+ 2 - 2
net/tipc/socket.c

@@ -1756,8 +1756,8 @@ static int getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	else if (len < sizeof(value)) {
 	else if (len < sizeof(value)) {
 		res = -EINVAL;
 		res = -EINVAL;
 	}
 	}
-	else if ((res = copy_to_user(ov, &value, sizeof(value)))) {
-		/* couldn't return value */
+	else if (copy_to_user(ov, &value, sizeof(value))) {
+		res = -EFAULT;
 	}
 	}
 	else {
 	else {
 		res = put_user(sizeof(value), ol);
 		res = put_user(sizeof(value), ol);