|
@@ -204,6 +204,19 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&ll->hcill_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (ll->hcill_state) {
|
|
|
+ case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * This state means that both the host and the BRF chip
|
|
|
+ * have simultaneously sent a wake-up-indication packet.
|
|
|
+ * Traditionaly, in this case, receiving a wake-up-indication
|
|
|
+ * was enough and an additional wake-up-ack wasn't needed.
|
|
|
+ * This has changed with the BRF6350, which does require an
|
|
|
+ * explicit wake-up-ack. Other BRF versions, which do not
|
|
|
+ * require an explicit ack here, do accept it, thus it is
|
|
|
+ * perfectly safe to always send one.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
|
|
|
+ /* deliberate fall-through - do not add break */
|
|
|
case HCILL_ASLEEP:
|
|
|
/* acknowledge device wake up */
|
|
|
if (send_hcill_cmd(HCILL_WAKE_UP_ACK, hu) < 0) {
|
|
@@ -211,16 +224,8 @@ static void ll_device_want_to_wakeup(struct hci_uart *hu)
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
- case HCILL_ASLEEP_TO_AWAKE:
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * this state means that a wake-up-indication
|
|
|
- * is already on its way to the device,
|
|
|
- * and will serve as the required wake-up-ack
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- BT_DBG("dual wake-up-indication");
|
|
|
- break;
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
- /* any other state are illegal */
|
|
|
+ /* any other state is illegal */
|
|
|
BT_ERR("received HCILL_WAKE_UP_IND in state %ld", ll->hcill_state);
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
}
|