浏览代码

Btrfs: Don't substract too much from the allocation target (avoid wrapping)

When metadata allocation clustering has to fall back to unclustered
allocs because large free areas could not be found, it was sometimes
substracting too much from the total bytes to allocate.  This would
make it wrap below zero.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Chris Mason 16 年之前
父节点
当前提交
5b7c3fcc46
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 5 次插入5 次删除
  1. 5 5
      fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

+ 5 - 5
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

@@ -2255,9 +2255,9 @@ new_group:
 		mutex_unlock(&block_group->alloc_mutex);
 new_group_no_lock:
 		last_wanted = 0;
-		if (!allowed_chunk_alloc && loop > 0) {
-			total_needed -= empty_cluster;
-			empty_cluster = 0;
+		if (!allowed_chunk_alloc) {
+			total_needed -= empty_size;
+			empty_size = 0;
 		}
 		/*
 		 * Here's how this works.
@@ -2277,8 +2277,8 @@ new_group_no_lock:
 			loop++;
 		} else if (loop == 1 && cur == head) {
 
-			total_needed -= empty_cluster;
-			empty_cluster = 0;
+			total_needed -= empty_size;
+			empty_size = 0;
 
 			if (allowed_chunk_alloc && !chunk_alloc_done) {
 				up_read(&space_info->groups_sem);