浏览代码

libata: retry FS IOs even if it has failed with AC_ERR_INVALID

libata currently doesn't retry if a command fails with AC_ERR_INVALID
assuming that retrying won't get it any further even if retried.
However, a failure may be classified as invalid through hardware
glitch (incorrect reading of the error register or firmware bug) and
there isn't whole lot to gain by not retrying as actually invalid
commands will be failed immediately.  Also, commands serving FS IOs
are extremely unlikely to be invalid.  Retry FS IOs even if it's
marked invalid.

Transient and incorrect invalid failure was seen while debugging
firmware related issue on Samsung n130 on bko#14314.

  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14314

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Tejun Heo 15 年之前
父节点
当前提交
534ead7092
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 3 次插入2 次删除
  1. 3 2
      drivers/ata/libata-eh.c

+ 3 - 2
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c

@@ -2028,8 +2028,9 @@ static void ata_eh_link_autopsy(struct ata_link *link)
 			qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER);
 			qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER);
 
 
 		/* determine whether the command is worth retrying */
 		/* determine whether the command is worth retrying */
-		if (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) &&
-		    ((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO) || qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV))
+		if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_IO ||
+		    (!(qc->err_mask & AC_ERR_INVALID) &&
+		     qc->err_mask != AC_ERR_DEV))
 			qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY;
 			qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY;
 
 
 		/* accumulate error info */
 		/* accumulate error info */