浏览代码

IPsec: fix handling of errors for socket policies

This treats the security errors encountered in the case of
socket policy matching, the same as how these are treated in
the case of main/sub policies, which is to return a full lookup
failure.

Signed-off-by: Venkat Yekkirala <vyekkirala@TrustedCS.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Venkat Yekkirala 18 年之前
父节点
当前提交
3bccfbc7a7
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 18 次插入8 次删除
  1. 18 8
      net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

+ 18 - 8
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

@@ -1016,12 +1016,16 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(struct sock *sk, int dir, struc
 						sk->sk_family);
  		int err = 0;
 
-		if (match)
-		  err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol, fl->secid, policy_to_flow_dir(dir));
-
- 		if (match && !err)
-			xfrm_pol_hold(pol);
-		else
+		if (match) {
+			err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol, fl->secid,
+					policy_to_flow_dir(dir));
+			if (!err)
+				xfrm_pol_hold(pol);
+			else if (err == -ESRCH)
+				pol = NULL;
+			else
+				pol = ERR_PTR(err);
+		} else
 			pol = NULL;
 	}
 	read_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
@@ -1313,8 +1317,11 @@ restart:
 	pol_dead = 0;
 	xfrm_nr = 0;
 
-	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[1])
+	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[1]) {
 		policy = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl);
+		if (IS_ERR(policy))
+			return PTR_ERR(policy);
+	}
 
 	if (!policy) {
 		/* To accelerate a bit...  */
@@ -1607,8 +1614,11 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	}
 
 	pol = NULL;
-	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir])
+	if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) {
 		pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl);
+		if (IS_ERR(pol))
+			return 0;
+	}
 
 	if (!pol)
 		pol = flow_cache_lookup(&fl, family, fl_dir,