|
@@ -139,19 +139,19 @@ static inline int nlm_cookie_match(struct nlm_cookie *a, struct nlm_cookie *b)
|
|
|
* Find a block with a given NLM cookie.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
static inline struct nlm_block *
|
|
|
-nlmsvc_find_block(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, struct sockaddr_in *sin)
|
|
|
+nlmsvc_find_block(struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
struct nlm_block *block;
|
|
|
|
|
|
list_for_each_entry(block, &nlm_blocked, b_list) {
|
|
|
- if (nlm_cookie_match(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie,cookie)
|
|
|
- && nlm_cmp_addr(sin, &block->b_host->h_addr))
|
|
|
+ if (nlm_cookie_match(&block->b_call->a_args.cookie,cookie))
|
|
|
goto found;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
found:
|
|
|
+ dprintk("nlmsvc_find_block(%s): block=%p\n", nlmdbg_cookie2a(cookie), block);
|
|
|
kref_get(&block->b_count);
|
|
|
return block;
|
|
|
}
|
|
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ found:
|
|
|
* request, but (as I found out later) that's because some implementations
|
|
|
* do just this. Never mind the standards comittees, they support our
|
|
|
* logging industries.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * 10 years later: I hope we can safely ignore these old and broken
|
|
|
+ * clients by now. Let's fix this so we can uniquely identify an incoming
|
|
|
+ * GRANTED_RES message by cookie, without having to rely on the client's IP
|
|
|
+ * address. --okir
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
static inline struct nlm_block *
|
|
|
nlmsvc_create_block(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
|
|
@@ -197,7 +202,7 @@ nlmsvc_create_block(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
|
|
|
/* Set notifier function for VFS, and init args */
|
|
|
call->a_args.lock.fl.fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
|
|
|
call->a_args.lock.fl.fl_lmops = &nlmsvc_lock_operations;
|
|
|
- call->a_args.cookie = *cookie; /* see above */
|
|
|
+ nlmclnt_next_cookie(&call->a_args.cookie);
|
|
|
|
|
|
dprintk("lockd: created block %p...\n", block);
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -640,17 +645,14 @@ static const struct rpc_call_ops nlmsvc_grant_ops = {
|
|
|
* block.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
-nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status)
|
|
|
+nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct nlm_cookie *cookie, u32 status)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
struct nlm_block *block;
|
|
|
- struct nlm_file *file;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- dprintk("grant_reply: looking for cookie %x, host (%08x), s=%d \n",
|
|
|
- *(unsigned int *)(cookie->data),
|
|
|
- ntohl(rqstp->rq_addr.sin_addr.s_addr), status);
|
|
|
- if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie, &rqstp->rq_addr)))
|
|
|
+ dprintk("grant_reply: looking for cookie %x, s=%d \n",
|
|
|
+ *(unsigned int *)(cookie->data), status);
|
|
|
+ if (!(block = nlmsvc_find_block(cookie)))
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
- file = block->b_file;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (block) {
|
|
|
if (status == NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD) {
|