reiserfs: don't lock journal_init()

journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem
is involved there.  journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be
reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there.  Just keep the
it around these two calls for safety.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

fs/reiserfs/journal.c

@@ -2678,16 +2678,10 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *sb, const char *j_dev_name,
 	char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
 	int ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Unlock here to avoid various RECLAIM-FS-ON <-> IN-RECLAIM-FS
-	 * dependency inversion warnings.
-	 */
-	reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
 	journal = SB_JOURNAL(sb) = vzalloc(sizeof(struct reiserfs_journal));
 	if (!journal) {
 		reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-1256",
 				 "unable to get memory for journal structure");
-		reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 		return 1;
 	}
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_bitmap_nodes);
@@ -2695,10 +2689,8 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *sb, const char *j_dev_name,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_working_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_journal_list);
 	journal->j_persistent_trans = 0;
-	ret = reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(sb, journal->j_list_bitmap,
-					   reiserfs_bmap_count(sb));
-	reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-	if (ret)
+	if (reiserfs_allocate_list_bitmaps(sb, journal->j_list_bitmap,
+					   reiserfs_bmap_count(sb)))
 		goto free_and_return;
 
 	allocate_bitmap_nodes(sb);
@@ -2727,27 +2719,11 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *sb, const char *j_dev_name,
 		goto free_and_return;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * We need to unlock here to avoid creating the following
-	 * dependency:
-	 * reiserfs_lock -> sysfs_mutex
-	 * Because the reiserfs mmap path creates the following dependency:
-	 * mm->mmap -> reiserfs_lock, hence we have
-	 * mm->mmap -> reiserfs_lock ->sysfs_mutex
-	 * This would ends up in a circular dependency with sysfs readdir path
-	 * which does sysfs_mutex -> mm->mmap_sem
-	 * This is fine because the reiserfs lock is useless in mount path,
-	 * at least until we call journal_begin. We keep it for paranoid
-	 * reasons.
-	 */
-	reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
 	if (journal_init_dev(sb, journal, j_dev_name) != 0) {
-		reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 		reiserfs_warning(sb, "sh-462",
 				 "unable to initialize jornal device");
 		goto free_and_return;
 	}
-	reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 
 	rs = SB_DISK_SUPER_BLOCK(sb);
 
@@ -2829,9 +2805,7 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *sb, const char *j_dev_name,
 	journal->j_mount_id = 10;
 	journal->j_state = 0;
 	atomic_set(&(journal->j_jlock), 0);
-	reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
 	journal->j_cnode_free_list = allocate_cnodes(num_cnodes);
-	reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 	journal->j_cnode_free_orig = journal->j_cnode_free_list;
 	journal->j_cnode_free = journal->j_cnode_free_list ? num_cnodes : 0;
 	journal->j_cnode_used = 0;
@@ -2848,24 +2822,37 @@ int journal_init(struct super_block *sb, const char *j_dev_name,
 
 	init_journal_hash(sb);
 	jl = journal->j_current_jl;
+
+	/*
+	 * get_list_bitmap() may call flush_commit_list() which
+	 * requires the lock. Calling flush_commit_list() shouldn't happen
+	 * this early but I like to be paranoid.
+	 */
+	reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
 	jl->j_list_bitmap = get_list_bitmap(sb, jl);
+	reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
 	if (!jl->j_list_bitmap) {
 		reiserfs_warning(sb, "journal-2005",
 				 "get_list_bitmap failed for journal list 0");
 		goto free_and_return;
 	}
-	if (journal_read(sb) < 0) {
+
+	/*
+	 * Journal_read needs to be inspected in order to push down
+	 * the lock further inside (or even remove it).
+	 */
+	reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
+	ret = journal_read(sb);
+	reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		reiserfs_warning(sb, "reiserfs-2006",
 				 "Replay Failure, unable to mount");
 		goto free_and_return;
 	}
 
 	reiserfs_mounted_fs_count++;
-	if (reiserfs_mounted_fs_count <= 1) {
-		reiserfs_write_unlock(sb);
+	if (reiserfs_mounted_fs_count <= 1)
 		commit_wq = alloc_workqueue("reiserfs", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
-		reiserfs_write_lock(sb);
-	}
 
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&journal->j_work, flush_async_commits);
 	journal->j_work_sb = sb;

fs/reiserfs/super.c

@@ -1826,6 +1826,17 @@ static int reiserfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
 		printk("reiserfs: using flush barriers\n");
 	}
 
+	// set_device_ro(s->s_dev, 1) ;
+	if (journal_init(s, jdev_name, old_format, commit_max_age)) {
+		SWARN(silent, s, "sh-2022",
+		      "unable to initialize journal space");
+		goto error_unlocked;
+	} else {
+		jinit_done = 1;	/* once this is set, journal_release must be called
+				 ** if we error out of the mount
+				 */
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * This path assumed to be called with the BKL in the old times.
 	 * Now we have inherited the big reiserfs lock from it and many
@@ -1836,16 +1847,6 @@ static int reiserfs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
 	 */
 	reiserfs_write_lock(s);
 
-	// set_device_ro(s->s_dev, 1) ;
-	if (journal_init(s, jdev_name, old_format, commit_max_age)) {
-		SWARN(silent, s, "sh-2022",
-		      "unable to initialize journal space");
-		goto error;
-	} else {
-		jinit_done = 1;	/* once this is set, journal_release must be called
-				 ** if we error out of the mount
-				 */
-	}
 	if (reread_meta_blocks(s)) {
 		SWARN(silent, s, "jmacd-9",
 		      "unable to reread meta blocks after journal init");