|
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ better)
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) Kerberos/SPNEGO session setup support - (started)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-e) NTLMv2 authentication (mostly implemented)
|
|
|
+e) NTLMv2 authentication (mostly implemented - double check
|
|
|
+that NTLMv2 signing works, also need to cleanup now unneeded SessSetup code in
|
|
|
+fs/cifs/connect.c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) MD5-HMAC signing SMB PDUs when SPNEGO style SessionSetup
|
|
|
used (Kerberos or NTLMSSP). Signing alreadyimplemented for NTLM
|
|
@@ -88,11 +90,12 @@ w) Finish up the dos time conversion routines needed to return old server
|
|
|
time to the client (default time, of now or time 0 is used now for these
|
|
|
very old servers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
-x) Add support for OS/2 (LANMAN 1.2 and LANMAN2.1 based SMB servers)
|
|
|
+x) In support for OS/2 (LANMAN 1.2 and LANMAN2.1 based SMB servers)
|
|
|
+need to add ability to set time to server (utimes command)
|
|
|
|
|
|
y) Finish testing of Windows 9x/Windows ME server support (started).
|
|
|
|
|
|
-KNOWN BUGS (updated April 29, 2005)
|
|
|
+KNOWN BUGS (updated February 26, 2007)
|
|
|
====================================
|
|
|
See http://bugzilla.samba.org - search on product "CifsVFS" for
|
|
|
current bug list.
|
|
@@ -107,11 +110,6 @@ but recognizes them
|
|
|
succeed but still return access denied (appears to be Windows
|
|
|
server not cifs client problem) and has not been reproduced recently.
|
|
|
NTFS partitions do not have this problem.
|
|
|
-4) debug connectathon lock test case 10 which fails against
|
|
|
-Samba (may be unmappable due to POSIX to Windows lock model
|
|
|
-differences but worth investigating). Also debug Samba to
|
|
|
-see why lock test case 7 takes longer to complete to Samba
|
|
|
-than to Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misc testing to do
|
|
|
==================
|
|
@@ -119,7 +117,7 @@ Misc testing to do
|
|
|
types. Try nested symlinks (8 deep). Return max path name in stat -f information
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Modify file portion of ltp so it can run against a mounted network
|
|
|
-share and run it against cifs vfs.
|
|
|
+share and run it against cifs vfs in automated fashion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Additional performance testing and optimization using iozone and similar -
|
|
|
there are some easy changes that can be done to parallelize sequential writes,
|