[PATCH] Update smc91x driver with ARM Versatile board info

We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new
generic IRQ layer will complain thusly:

No IRQF_TRIGGER set_type function for IRQ 25 (<NULL>)

Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:50:40 +0100
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:42:04PM -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new
> > generic IRQ layer will complain thusly:
>
> I don't think I heard anything back from my previous suggestion that
> the IRQ flags are passed through the platform device IRQ resource.
>
> Doing so would avoid adding yet another platform specific block into
> the file.
>
> BTW, Integrator platforms will also suffer from this, which will add
> another ifdef to this header.
>
> Let's do it right and arrange to pass these flags from the platform
> code.  It's not like they're in a critical path.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>

drivers/net/smc91x.h

@@ -434,6 +434,24 @@ static inline void LPD7_SMC_outsw (unsigned char* a, int r,
 
 #define SMC_IRQ_FLAGS		(0)
 
+#elif	defined(CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE)
+
+#define SMC_CAN_USE_8BIT	1
+#define SMC_CAN_USE_16BIT	1
+#define SMC_CAN_USE_32BIT	1
+#define SMC_NOWAIT		1
+
+#define SMC_inb(a, r)		readb((a) + (r))
+#define SMC_inw(a, r)		readw((a) + (r))
+#define SMC_inl(a, r)		readl((a) + (r))
+#define SMC_outb(v, a, r)	writeb(v, (a) + (r))
+#define SMC_outw(v, a, r)	writew(v, (a) + (r))
+#define SMC_outl(v, a, r)	writel(v, (a) + (r))
+#define SMC_insl(a, r, p, l)	readsl((a) + (r), p, l)
+#define SMC_outsl(a, r, p, l)	writesl((a) + (r), p, l)
+
+#define SMC_IRQ_FLAGS		(0)
+
 #else
 
 #define SMC_CAN_USE_8BIT	1