소스 검색

r8169: avoid needless NAPI poll scheduling

Theory  : though needless, it should not have hurt.
Practice: it does not play nice with DEBUG_SHIRQ + LOCKDEP + UP
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242572).

The patch makes sense in itself but I should dig why it has an effect
on #242572 (assuming that NAPI do not change in a near future).

Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Edward Hsu <edward_hsu@realtek.com.tw>
Francois Romieu 18 년 전
부모
커밋
313b0305b5
1개의 변경된 파일10개의 추가작업 그리고 8개의 파일을 삭제
  1. 10 8
      drivers/net/r8169.c

+ 10 - 8
drivers/net/r8169.c

@@ -2767,14 +2767,16 @@ static irqreturn_t rtl8169_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
 			rtl8169_check_link_status(dev, tp, ioaddr);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_R8169_NAPI
-		RTL_W16(IntrMask, tp->intr_event & ~tp->napi_event);
-		tp->intr_mask = ~tp->napi_event;
-
-		if (likely(netif_rx_schedule_prep(dev)))
-			__netif_rx_schedule(dev);
-		else if (netif_msg_intr(tp)) {
-			printk(KERN_INFO "%s: interrupt %04x taken in poll\n",
-			       dev->name, status);
+		if (status & tp->napi_event) {
+			RTL_W16(IntrMask, tp->intr_event & ~tp->napi_event);
+			tp->intr_mask = ~tp->napi_event;
+
+			if (likely(netif_rx_schedule_prep(dev)))
+				__netif_rx_schedule(dev);
+			else if (netif_msg_intr(tp)) {
+				printk(KERN_INFO "%s: interrupt %04x in poll\n",
+				       dev->name, status);
+			}
 		}
 		break;
 #else