Browse Source

[PATCH] s390: alternate signal stack handling bug

If a signal handler has been established with the SA_ONSTACK option but no
alternate stack is provided with sigaltstack(), the kernel still tries to
install the alternate stack.  Also when setting an alternate stack with
sigalstack() and the SS_DISABLE flag, the kernel tries to install the
alternate stack on signal delivery.  Use the correct conditions sas_ss_flags()
to check if the alternate stack has to be used.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Meyer <meyerlau@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Laurent Meyer 19 years ago
parent
commit
28f223782b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 1 1
      arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c

+ 1 - 1
arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c

@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs * regs, size_t frame_size)
 
 
 	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
 	/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching.  */
 	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
 	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
-		if (! on_sig_stack(sp))
+		if (! sas_ss_flags(sp))
 			sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
 			sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
 	}
 	}