|
@@ -656,22 +656,34 @@ lookup_out:
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
cifs_d_revalidate(struct dentry *direntry, struct nameidata *nd)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
- int isValid = 1;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
if (direntry->d_inode) {
|
|
|
if (cifs_revalidate_dentry(direntry))
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
- } else {
|
|
|
- cFYI(1, "neg dentry 0x%p name = %s",
|
|
|
- direntry, direntry->d_name.name);
|
|
|
- if (time_after(jiffies, direntry->d_time + HZ) ||
|
|
|
- !lookupCacheEnabled) {
|
|
|
- d_drop(direntry);
|
|
|
- isValid = 0;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
+ return 1;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- return isValid;
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * This may be nfsd (or something), anyway, we can't see the
|
|
|
+ * intent of this. So, since this can be for creation, drop it.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (!nd)
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * Drop the negative dentry, in order to make sure to use the
|
|
|
+ * case sensitive name which is specified by user if this is
|
|
|
+ * for creation.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (!(nd->flags & (LOOKUP_CONTINUE | LOOKUP_PARENT))) {
|
|
|
+ if (nd->flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET))
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (time_after(jiffies, direntry->d_time + HZ) || !lookupCacheEnabled)
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ return 1;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* static int cifs_d_delete(struct dentry *direntry)
|
|
@@ -709,15 +721,8 @@ static int cifs_ci_compare(struct dentry *dentry, struct qstr *a,
|
|
|
struct nls_table *codepage = CIFS_SB(dentry->d_inode->i_sb)->local_nls;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((a->len == b->len) &&
|
|
|
- (nls_strnicmp(codepage, a->name, b->name, a->len) == 0)) {
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * To preserve case, don't let an existing negative dentry's
|
|
|
- * case take precedence. If a is not a negative dentry, this
|
|
|
- * should have no side effects
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- memcpy((void *)a->name, b->name, a->len);
|
|
|
+ (nls_strnicmp(codepage, a->name, b->name, a->len) == 0))
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|