소스 검색

[PATCH] get rid of __exit_files(), __exit_fs() and __put_fs_struct()

The only reason to have separated __...() for those was to keep them inlined
for local users in exit.c.  Since Alexey removed the inline on those, there's
no reason whatsoever to keep them around; just collapse with normal variants.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro 17 년 전
부모
커밋
1ec7f1ddbe
1개의 변경된 파일6개의 추가작업 그리고 21개의 파일을 삭제
  1. 6 21
      kernel/exit.c

+ 6 - 21
kernel/exit.c

@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void reset_files_struct(struct task_struct *tsk, struct files_struct *files)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(reset_files_struct);
 
-static void __exit_files(struct task_struct *tsk)
+void exit_files(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct files_struct * files = tsk->files;
 
@@ -533,12 +533,7 @@ static void __exit_files(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	}
 }
 
-void exit_files(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	__exit_files(tsk);
-}
-
-static void __put_fs_struct(struct fs_struct *fs)
+void put_fs_struct(struct fs_struct *fs)
 {
 	/* No need to hold fs->lock if we are killing it */
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&fs->count)) {
@@ -550,12 +545,7 @@ static void __put_fs_struct(struct fs_struct *fs)
 	}
 }
 
-void put_fs_struct(struct fs_struct *fs)
-{
-	__put_fs_struct(fs);
-}
-
-static void __exit_fs(struct task_struct *tsk)
+void exit_fs(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	struct fs_struct * fs = tsk->fs;
 
@@ -563,15 +553,10 @@ static void __exit_fs(struct task_struct *tsk)
 		task_lock(tsk);
 		tsk->fs = NULL;
 		task_unlock(tsk);
-		__put_fs_struct(fs);
+		put_fs_struct(fs);
 	}
 }
 
-void exit_fs(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
-	__exit_fs(tsk);
-}
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(exit_fs);
 
 /*
@@ -967,8 +952,8 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
 	if (group_dead)
 		acct_process();
 	exit_sem(tsk);
-	__exit_files(tsk);
-	__exit_fs(tsk);
+	exit_files(tsk);
+	exit_fs(tsk);
 	check_stack_usage();
 	exit_thread();
 	cgroup_exit(tsk, 1);