Browse Source

On 24K we did always disable cache parity protection - obviously not
the greatest thing to do. Try to enable parity protection, check if
we actually succeeded and print a message about the outcome of this.

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>

Ralf Baechle 20 years ago
parent
commit
14f18b7f7e
1 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
  1. 5 9
      arch/mips/kernel/traps.c

+ 5 - 9
arch/mips/kernel/traps.c

@@ -736,16 +736,12 @@ static inline void parity_protection_init(void)
 {
 {
 	switch (current_cpu_data.cputype) {
 	switch (current_cpu_data.cputype) {
 	case CPU_24K:
 	case CPU_24K:
-		/* 24K cache parity not currently implemented in FPGA */
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Disable cache parity protection for "
-		       "MIPS 24K CPU.\n");
-		write_c0_ecc(read_c0_ecc() & ~0x80000000);
-		break;
 	case CPU_5KC:
 	case CPU_5KC:
-		/* Set the PE bit (bit 31) in the c0_ecc register. */
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Enable cache parity protection for "
-		       "MIPS 5KC/24K CPUs.\n");
-		write_c0_ecc(read_c0_ecc() | 0x80000000);
+		write_c0_ecc(0x80000000);
+		back_to_back_c0_hazard();
+		/* Set the PE bit (bit 31) in the c0_errctl register. */
+		printk(KERN_INFO "Cache parity protection %sabled\n",
+		       (read_c0_ecc() & 0x80000000) ? "en" : "dis");
 		break;
 		break;
 	case CPU_20KC:
 	case CPU_20KC:
 	case CPU_25KF:
 	case CPU_25KF: