Pārlūkot izejas kodu

proc_sysctl: use CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL around ipc and utsname proc_handlers

As pointed out by Cedric Le Goater (in response to Alexey's original
comment wrt mqns), ipc_sysctl.c and utsname_sysctl.c are using
CONFIG_PROC_FS, not CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL, to determine whether to define
the proc_handlers.  Change that.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Serge E. Hallyn 16 gadi atpakaļ
vecāks
revīzija
11dea19009
2 mainītis faili ar 2 papildinājumiem un 2 dzēšanām
  1. 1 1
      ipc/ipc_sysctl.c
  2. 1 1
      kernel/utsname_sysctl.c

+ 1 - 1
ipc/ipc_sysctl.c

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static void *get_ipc(ctl_table *table)
 	return which;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
 static int proc_ipc_dointvec(ctl_table *table, int write, struct file *filp,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
 {

+ 1 - 1
kernel/utsname_sysctl.c

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static void put_uts(ctl_table *table, int write, void *which)
 		up_write(&uts_sem);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL
 /*
  *	Special case of dostring for the UTS structure. This has locks
  *	to observe. Should this be in kernel/sys.c ????