|
@@ -2198,10 +2198,25 @@ relock:
|
|
|
return signr;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+/*
|
|
|
+ * It could be that complete_signal() picked us to notify about the
|
|
|
+ * group-wide signal. Another thread should be notified now to take
|
|
|
+ * the signal since we will not.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+static void retarget_shared_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ struct task_struct *t;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ t = tsk;
|
|
|
+ while_each_thread(tsk, t) {
|
|
|
+ if (!signal_pending(t) && !(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
|
|
|
+ recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
void exit_signals(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
int group_stop = 0;
|
|
|
- struct task_struct *t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (thread_group_empty(tsk) || signal_group_exit(tsk->signal)) {
|
|
|
tsk->flags |= PF_EXITING;
|
|
@@ -2217,14 +2232,7 @@ void exit_signals(struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
if (!signal_pending(tsk))
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * It could be that __group_complete_signal() choose us to
|
|
|
- * notify about group-wide signal. Another thread should be
|
|
|
- * woken now to take the signal since we will not.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- for (t = tsk; (t = next_thread(t)) != tsk; )
|
|
|
- if (!signal_pending(t) && !(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
|
|
|
- recalc_sigpending_and_wake(t);
|
|
|
+ retarget_shared_pending(tsk);
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (unlikely(tsk->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING) &&
|
|
|
task_participate_group_stop(tsk))
|