perf test: Update "sample parsing" test for PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION

In fact the "sample parsing" test does not automatically check new
sample type bits - they must be added to the comparison logic.

Doing that shows that the test fails because the functions
perf_event__synthesize_sample() and perf_event__sample_event_size() have
not been updated with PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION either.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383313899-15987-10-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c

@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC)
 		COMP(data_src);
 
+	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION)
+		COMP(transaction);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -165,6 +168,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs_user, u64 read_format)
 		.cpu		= 110,
 		.raw_size	= sizeof(raw_data),
 		.data_src	= 111,
+		.transaction	= 112,
 		.raw_data	= (void *)raw_data,
 		.callchain	= &callchain.callchain,
 		.branch_stack	= &branch_stack.branch_stack,
@@ -273,7 +277,8 @@ int test__sample_parsing(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * Fail the test if it has not been updated when new sample format bits
-	 * were added.
+	 * were added.  Please actually update the test rather than just change
+	 * the condition below.
 	 */
 	if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION << 1) {
 		pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n");