Explorar el Código

Return the right error value when dup[23]() newfd argument is too large

Jack Lin reports that the error return from dup3() for the RLIMIT_NOFILE
case changed incorrectly after 3.6.

The culprit is commit f33ff9927f42 ("take rlimit check to callers of
expand_files()") which when it moved the "return -EMFILE" out to the
caller, didn't notice that the dup3() had special code to turn the
EMFILE return into EBADF.

The replace_fd() helper that got added later then inherited the bug too.

Reported-by: Jack Lin <linliangjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[ Noted more bugs, wrote proper changelog, fixed up typos - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Al Viro hace 12 años
padre
commit
08f05c4974
Se han modificado 1 ficheros con 2 adiciones y 2 borrados
  1. 2 2
      fs/file.c

+ 2 - 2
fs/file.c

@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ int replace_fd(unsigned fd, struct file *file, unsigned flags)
 		return __close_fd(files, fd);
 
 	if (fd >= rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE))
-		return -EMFILE;
+		return -EBADF;
 
 	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
 	err = expand_files(files, fd);
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(dup3, unsigned int, oldfd, unsigned int, newfd, int, flags)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (newfd >= rlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE))
-		return -EMFILE;
+		return -EBADF;
 
 	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
 	err = expand_files(files, newfd);